Literature DB >> 24431774

Comparison of implant stability before prosthetic loading of two dental implant systems.

Sanjay Balaji Lagdive1, Sushma Sanjay Lagdive2.   

Abstract

Dental implantology is the state of the art technique to replace missing teeth. Implant stability of implant jeopardizes its longevity and success of treatment. This study evaluates the implant stability of implant before and after 4 months of the implant placement, but before prosthetically loading it. Ten two-stage implants of Life care and Nobel Biocare dental implants were placed in 20 patients. Digital OPG was taken on the day of implant placement. After 4 months, at the time of second stage surgery, the implant stability was evaluated by the Periotest instrument. Four months after the implant placement, Periotest evaluation showed a mean of 1.9, which indicated that implants were well osseointegrated and stable. Even before prosthetically loading the two-stage implant, crestal bone loss of 0.6-0.9 mm occurred around the implant. The smooth polished collar design of the implant may have contributed to crestal bone loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collar design; Crestal bone loss; Implants; Periotest

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431774      PMCID: PMC3792324          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0248-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  10 in total

1.  Dynamic behavior of implants as a measure of osseointegration.

Authors:  L C Ramp; R L Jeffcoat
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.

Authors:  J A Bittar-Cortez; L A Passeri; S M de Almeida; F Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Methods used to assess implant stability: current status.

Authors:  Mihoko Atsumi; Sang-Hoon Park; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man.

Authors:  M Paolantonio; M Dolci; A Scarano; D d'Archivio; G di Placido; V Tumini; A Piattelli
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 5.  Immediate implant placement: treatment planning and surgical steps for successful outcome.

Authors:  William Becker; Moshe Goldstein
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.589

6.  Assessment of implant mobility at second-stage surgery with the Periotest: DICRG Interim Report No. 3. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group.

Authors:  R S Truhlar; H F Morris; S Ochi; S Winkler
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.454

7.  The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.

Authors:  K Dula; R Mini; P F van der Stelt; D Buser
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Immediate occlusal loading of implants placed in fresh sockets after tooth extraction.

Authors:  Roberto Crespi; Paolo Capparè; Enrico Gherlone; George E Romanos
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Immediate implants supporting single crown restoration: a 4-year prospective study.

Authors:  Ugo Covani; Roberto Crespi; Roberto Cornelini; Antonio Barone
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients.

Authors:  Leif Kullman; Adel Al-Asfour; Lars Zetterqvist; Lars Andersson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.