Literature DB >> 11606612

Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone.

A G Robling1, D B Burr, C H Turner.   

Abstract

Bone cells are capable of sensing and responding to mechanical forces, but mechanosensitivity begins to decline soon after the stimulus is initiated. Under continued stimulation, bone is desensitized to mechanical stimuli. We sought to determine the amount of time required to restore mechanosensitivity to desensitized bone cells in vivo by manipulating the recovery time (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 or 8 h) allowed between four identical daily loading bouts. We also investigated the osteogenic effectiveness of shorter-term recovery periods, lasting several seconds (0.5, 3.5, 7 or 14 s), introduced between each of 36 identical daily loading cycles. Using the rat tibia four-point bending model, the right tibia of 144 adult female Sprague-Dawley rats was subjected to bending, sham bending or no loading. In the rats receiving recovery periods between loading bouts, histomorphometric measurements from the endocortical surface of the loaded and nonloaded control (left) tibiae revealed more than 100 % higher relative bone formation rates in the 8 h recovery group than in the 0 and 0.5 h recovery groups. Approximately 8 h of recovery was sufficient to restore full mechanosensitivity to the cells. In the rats allowed time to recover between load cycles, 14 s of recovery resulted in significantly higher (66-190 %) relative bone formation rates compared to any of the three shorter recovery periods. In both experiments, bone formation in the sham-bending animals was similar to that in the nonloaded control group. The results demonstrate the importance of recovery periods for (i) restoring mechanosensitivity to bone cells and (ii) maximizing the osteogenic effects of mechanical loading (exercise) regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606612     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.19.3389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  83 in total

Review 1.  Why rest stimulates bone formation: a hypothesis based on complex adaptive phenomenon.

Authors:  Ted S Gross; Sandra L Poliachik; Brandon J Ausk; David A Sanford; Blair A Becker; Sundar Srinivasan
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle.

Authors:  Sundar Srinivasan; David A Weimer; Steven C Agans; Steven D Bain; Ted S Gross
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Mechanical stretching for tissue engineering: two-dimensional and three-dimensional constructs.

Authors:  Brandon D Riehl; Jae-Hong Park; Il Keun Kwon; Jung Yul Lim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  Mechanisms by which exercise improves bone strength.

Authors:  Charles H Turner; Alexander G Robling
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Exercises for improving bone strength.

Authors:  C H Turner; A G Robling
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Mechanically induced intracellular calcium waves in osteoblasts demonstrate calcium fingerprints in bone cell mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Lindsay M Godin; Sakiko Suzuki; Christopher R Jacobs; Henry J Donahue; Seth W Donahue
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2006-11-03

7.  32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; DeWayne Threet; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Stimulation of osteoblasts using rest periods during bioreactor culture on collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds.

Authors:  Sonia Partap; Niamh A Plunkett; Daniel J Kelly; Fergal J O'Brien
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Minimum level of jumping exercise required to maintain exercise-induced bone gains in female rats.

Authors:  F K Ooi; R Singh; H J Singh; Y Umemura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Numerical modeling of long bone adaptation due to mechanical loading: correlation with experiments.

Authors:  Natarajan Chennimalai Kumar; Jonathan A Dantzig; Iwona M Jasiuk; Alex G Robling; Charles H Turner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.