Literature DB >> 18280231

32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Sandra L Poliachik1, DeWayne Threet, Sundar Srinivasan, Ted S Gross.   

Abstract

Numerous studies indicate that C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice are mildly responsive to mechanical loading compared to C57BL/6J (C57) mice. Guided by data indicating high baseline periosteal osteoblast activity in 16 wk C3H mice, we speculated that simply allowing the C3H mice to age until basal periosteal bone formation was equivalent to that of 16 wk C57 mice would restore mechanoresponsiveness in C3H mice. We tested this hypothesis by subjecting the right tibiae of 32 wk old C3H mice and 16 wk old C57 mice to low magnitude rest-inserted loading (peak strain: 1235 mu epsilon) and then exposing the right tibiae of 32 wk C3H mice to low (1085 mu epsilon) or moderate (1875 mu epsilon) magnitude cyclic loading. The osteoblastic response to loading on the endocortical and periosteal surfaces was evaluated via dynamic histomorphometry. At 32 wk of age, C3H mice responded to low magnitude rest-inserted loading with significantly elevated periosteal mineralizing surface, mineral apposition rate and bone formation compared to unloaded contralateral bones. Surprisingly, the periosteal bone formation induced by low magnitude rest-inserted loading in C3H mice exceeded that induced in 16 wk C57 mice. At 32 wk of age, C3H mice also demonstrated an elevated response to increased magnitudes of cyclic loading. We conclude that a high level of basal osteoblast function in 16 wk C3H mice appears to overwhelm the ability of the tissue to respond to an otherwise anabolic mechanical loading stimulus. However, when basal surface osteoblast activity is equivalent to that of 16 wk C57 mice, C3H mice demonstrate a clear ability to respond to either rest-inserted or cyclic loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280231      PMCID: PMC2366046          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.12.222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  58 in total

1.  Mechanotransduction in bone: genetic effects on mechanosensitivity in mice.

Authors:  A G Robling; C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces expression of the Wnt signaling co-regulator LRP5 via regulatory elements located significantly downstream of the gene's transcriptional start site.

Authors:  Jackie A Fretz; Lee A Zella; Sungtae Kim; Nirupama K Shevde; J Wesley Pike
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 3.  Exercise and its interaction with genetic influences in the determination of bone mineral density.

Authors:  J A Eisman; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; N A Pocock
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-11-25       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Bone intrinsic material properties in three inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  M P Akhter; Z Fan; J Y Rho
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral density.

Authors:  E A Krall; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Identification of genetic loci that regulate bone adaptive response to mechanical loading in C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ mice intercross.

Authors:  Chandrasekhar Kesavan; Subburaman Mohan; Apurva K Srivastava; Susanna Kapoor; Jon E Wergedal; Hongrun Yu; David J Baylink
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Osteoblast-targeted expression of Sfrp4 in mice results in low bone mass.

Authors:  Rika Nakanishi; Haruhiko Akiyama; Hiroaki Kimura; Bungo Otsuki; Motoyuki Shimizu; Tadao Tsuboyama; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Allelic differences in a quantitative trait locus affecting insulin-like growth factor-I impact skeletal acquisition and body composition.

Authors:  Clifford J Rosen; Cheryl Ackert-Bicknell; Wesley G Beamer; Tracy Nelson; Martin Adamo; Pinchas Cohen; Mary L Bouxsein; Mark C Horowitz
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Bone adaptation response to sham and bending stimuli in mice.

Authors:  M P Akhter; D M Cullen; R R Recker
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Gabriel M Pagnotti; Maya Styner; Gunes Uzer; Vihitaben S Patel; Laura E Wright; Kirsten K Ness; Theresa A Guise; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Differences in bone structure and unloading-induced bone loss between C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Jeyantt S Sankaran; Manasvi Varshney; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Bone mechanotransduction may require augmentation in order to strengthen the senescent skeleton.

Authors:  Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross; Steven D Bain
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 10.895

4.  Morphology of Mouse Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Complex Changes Following Exercise During Pubertal Growth.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Colin T Martin; Danielle N Ochocki; Bonnie T Nolan; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Separating Fluid Shear Stress from Acceleration during Vibrations in Vitro: Identification of Mechanical Signals Modulating the Cellular Response.

Authors:  Gunes Uzer; Sarah L Manske; M Ete Chan; Fu-Pen Chiang; Clinton T Rubin; Mary D Frame; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Adaptation of tibial structure and strength to axial compression depends on loading history in both C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Nilsson Holguin; Michael D Brodt; Michelle E Sanchez; Akhilesh A Kotiya; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Experimental and finite element analysis of dynamic loading of the mouse forearm.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Yunkai Lu; Mark Dallas; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Enhanced osteoclastic resorption and responsiveness to mechanical load in gap junction deficient bone.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Emmanuel M Paul; Vikram Sathyendra; Andrew Davison; Neil Sharkey; Sarah Bronson; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  At the nuclear envelope of bone mechanobiology.

Authors:  Scott Birks; Gunes Uzer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.626

10.  Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and is confined to the loaded bones.

Authors:  Toshihiro Sugiyama; Joanna S Price; Lance E Lanyon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.