Literature DB >> 20013156

Numerical modeling of long bone adaptation due to mechanical loading: correlation with experiments.

Natarajan Chennimalai Kumar1, Jonathan A Dantzig, Iwona M Jasiuk, Alex G Robling, Charles H Turner.   

Abstract

The process of external bone adaptation in cortical bone is modeled mathematically using finite element (FE) stress analysis coupled with an evolution model, in which adaptation response is triggered by mechanical stimulus represented by strain energy density. The model is applied to experiments in which a rat ulna is subjected to cyclic loading, and the results demonstrate the ability of the model to predict the bone adaptation response. The FE mesh is generated from micro-computed tomography (microCT) images of the rat ulna, and the stress analysis is carried out using boundary and loading conditions on the rat ulna obtained from the experiments [Robling, A. G., F. M. Hinant, D. B. Burr, and C. H. Turner. J. Bone Miner. Res. 17:1545-1554, 2002]. The external adaptation process is implemented in the model by moving the surface nodes of the FE mesh based on an evolution law characterized by two parameters: one that captures the rate of the adaptation process (referred to as gain); and the other characterizing the threshold value of the mechanical stimulus required for adaptation (referred to as threshold-sensitivity). A parametric study is carried out to evaluate the effect of these two parameters on the adaptation response. We show, following comparison of results from the simulations to the experimental observations of Robling et al. (J. Bone Miner. Res. 17:1545-1554, 2002), that splitting the loading cycles into different number of bouts affects the threshold-sensitivity but not the rate of adaptation. We also show that the threshold-sensitivity parameter can quantify the mechanosensitivity of the osteocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20013156      PMCID: PMC3412135          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9861-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  36 in total

1.  The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models.

Authors:  H Weinans; R Huiskes; H J Grootenboer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Mechanotransduction and strain amplification in osteocyte cell processes.

Authors:  Yuefeng Han; Stephen C Cowin; Mitchell B Schaffler; Sheldon Weinbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An energy dissipation-based model for damage stimulated bone adaptation.

Authors:  M E Levenston; D R Carter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  In vivo tracer transport through the lacunocanalicular system of rat bone in an environment devoid of mechanical loading.

Authors:  M L Knothe Tate; P Niederer; U Knothe
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Mechanical factors in bone growth and development.

Authors:  D R Carter; M C Van Der Meulen; G S Beaupré
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Mechanobiologic influences in long bone cross-sectional growth.

Authors:  M C van der Meulen; G S Beaupré; D R Carter
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Prediction of bone adaptation using damage accumulation.

Authors:  P J Prendergast; D Taylor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Fluid shear-induced mechanical signaling in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts requires cytoskeleton-integrin interactions.

Authors:  F M Pavalko; N X Chen; C H Turner; D B Burr; S Atkinson; Y F Hsieh; J Qiu; R L Duncan
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-12

10.  Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow?

Authors:  C H Turner; M R Forwood; M W Otter
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

1.  In vivo mechanical loading rapidly activates β-catenin signaling in osteocytes through a prostaglandin mediated mechanism.

Authors:  N Lara-Castillo; N A Kim-Weroha; M A Kamel; B Javaheri; D L Ellies; R E Krumlauf; G Thiagarajan; M L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Follistatin-like 3 is a mediator of exercise-driven bone formation and strengthening.

Authors:  J Nam; P Perera; R Gordon; Y H Jeong; A D Blazek; D G Kim; B C Tee; Z Sun; T D Eubank; Y Zhao; B Lablebecioglu; S Liu; A Litsky; N L Weisleder; B S Lee; T Butterfield; A L Schneyer; S Agarwal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Gene expression patterns in bone following mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sara M Mantila Roosa; Yunlong Liu; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Form follows function: a computational simulation exercise on bone shape forming and conservation.

Authors:  U Mittag; A Kriechbaumer; M Bartsch; J Rittweger
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Torsion - an underestimated form shaping entity in bone adaptation?

Authors:  Uwe Mittag; Andreas Kriechbaumer; Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Age and Sex Differences in Load-Induced Tibial Cortical Bone Surface Strain Maps.

Authors:  Alessandra Carriero; Behzad Javaheri; Neda Bassir Kazeruni; Andrew A Pitsillides; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-02-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.