Literature DB >> 11597795

Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer.

K K Ang1, A Trotti, B W Brown, A S Garden, R L Foote, W H Morrison, F B Geara, D W Klotch, H Goepfert, L J Peters.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial was undertaken in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to address (1) the validity of using pathologic risk features, established from a previous study, to determine the need for, and dose of, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); (2) the impact of accelerating PORT using a concomitant boost schedule; and (3) the importance of the overall combined treatment duration on the treatment outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 288 consecutive patients with advanced disease registered preoperatively, 213 fulfilled the trial criteria and went on to receive therapy predicated on a set of pathologic risk features: no PORT for the low-risk group (n = 31); 57.6 Gy during 6.5 weeks for the intermediate-risk group (n = 31); and, by random assignment, 63 Gy during 5 weeks (n = 76) or 7 weeks (n = 75) for the high-risk group. Patients were irradiated with standard techniques appropriate to the site of disease and likely areas of spread. The study end points were locoregional control (LRC), survival, and morbidity.
RESULTS: Patients with low or intermediate risks had significantly higher LRC and survival rates than those with high-risk features (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0001, respectively), despite receiving no PORT or lower dose PORT, respectively. For high-risk patients, a trend toward higher LRC and survival rates was noted when PORT was delivered in 5 rather than 7 weeks. A prolonged interval between surgery and PORT in the 7-week schedule was associated with significantly lower LRC (p = 0.03) and survival (p = 0.01) rates. Consequently, the cumulative duration of combined therapy had a significant impact on the LRC (p = 0.005) and survival (p = 0.03) rates. A 2-week reduction in the PORT duration by using the concomitant boost technique did not increase the late treatment toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: This Phase III trial established the power of risk assessment using pathologic features in determining the need for, and dose of, PORT in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer in a prospective, multi-institutional setting. It also revealed the impact of the overall treatment time in the combination of surgery and PORT on the outcome in high-risk patients and showed that PORT acceleration without a reduction in dose by a concomitant boost regimen did not increase the late complication rate. These findings emphasize the importance of coordinated interdisciplinary care in the delivery of combined surgery and RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11597795     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01690-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  115 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Posttreatment Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer without Clinical Evidence of Recurrence: Should Surveillance Imaging Extend Beyond 6 Months?

Authors:  A Gore; K Baugnon; J Beitler; N F Saba; M R Patel; X Wu; B J Boyce; A H Aiken
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Nomogram Identifies Age as the Most Important Predictor of Overall Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer After Primary Surgery.

Authors:  Supriya Gupta; Jennifer Waller; Jimmy Brown; Yolanda Elam; James V Rawson; Darko Pucar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-08-16

4.  Postoperative radiotherapy with simultaneous chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a novel standard that opens new questions.

Authors:  Jordi Giralt; Jacques Bernier
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Adjuvant treatment of locally-advanced head and neck tumours.

Authors:  Victoria Reyes López; Begoña Navalpotro Yagüe
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  miRNA expression profiles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and adjacent normal tissue.

Authors:  Latha Ramdas; Uma Giri; Cheryl L Ashorn; Kevin R Coombes; Adel El-Naggar; K Kian Ang; Michael D Story
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Joo; Ie-Ryung Yoo; Kwang-Jae Cho; Jun-Ook Park; In-Chul Nam; Chung-Soo Kim; Min-Sik Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Final Report of a Prospective Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Dose-Response Relationship for Postoperative Radiation Therapy and Pathologic Risk Groups in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  David I Rosenthal; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; Adel K El-Naggar; Mona Kamal; Randal S Weber; Clifton D Fuller; Lester J Peters
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Competing causes of death and medical comorbidities among patients with human papillomavirus-positive vs human papillomavirus-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma and impact on adherence to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Clayton B Hess; Dominique L Rash; Megan E Daly; D Gregory Farwell; John Bishop; Andrew T Vaughan; Machelle D Wilson; Allen M Chen
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 10.  The diagnosis and treatment of oral cavity cancer.

Authors:  Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Markus Follmann; Alexander Nast
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.