Literature DB >> 32554418

Posttreatment Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer without Clinical Evidence of Recurrence: Should Surveillance Imaging Extend Beyond 6 Months?

A Gore1, K Baugnon1, J Beitler2, N F Saba3,4, M R Patel4, X Wu1, B J Boyce4, A H Aiken5,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Early detection of residual or recurrent disease is important for effective salvage treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not recommend standard surveillance imaging beyond 6 months unless there are worrisome signs or symptoms on clinical examination and offer vague guidelines for imaging of high-risk patients beyond that timeframe. Our goal was to evaluate the frequency of clinically occult recurrence in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with positive imaging findings (Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems scores of 2-4), especially after 6 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective data base search queried neck CT reports with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems scores of 2-4 from June 2014 to March 2018. The electronic medical records were reviewed to determine outcomes of clinical and radiologic follow-up, including symptoms, physical examination findings, pathologic correlation, and clinical notes within 3 months of imaging.
RESULTS: A total of 255 cases, all with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems scores of 2 or 3, met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-nine patients (23%) demonstrated recurrence (45 biopsy-proven, 14 based on clinical and imaging progression), and 21 patients (36%) had clinically occult recurrence (ie, no clinical evidence of disease at the time of the imaging examination). The median overall time to radiologically detected, clinically occult recurrence was 11.4 months from treatment completion.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging surveillance beyond the first posttreatment baseline study was critical for detecting clinically occult recurrent disease in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. More than one-third of all recurrences were seen in patients without clinical evidence of disease; and 81% of clinically occult recurrences occurred beyond 6 months.
© 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32554418      PMCID: PMC7357658          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  29 in total

1.  Oral squamous cell carcinoma and a clinically negative neck: the value of follow-up.

Authors:  Bart M Wensing; Matthias A W Merkx; Paul F M Krabbe; Henri A M Marres; Frank J A Van den Hoogen
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Seng Chuan Ong; Heiko Schöder; Nancy Y Lee; Snehal G Patel; Diane Carlson; Matthew Fury; David G Pfister; Jatin P Shah; Steven M Larson; Dennis H Kraus
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Failure at the primary site following multimodality treatment in advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  B Vikram; E W Strong; J P Shah; R Spiro
Journal:  Head Neck Surg       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb

4.  Impact of surveillance on survival after laryngeal cancer in the medicare population.

Authors:  David O Francis; Bevan Yueh; Ernest A Weymuller; Albert L Merati
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Randomized trial of postoperative reirradiation combined with chemotherapy after salvage surgery compared with salvage surgery alone in head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  François Janot; Dominique de Raucourt; Ellen Benhamou; Christophe Ferron; Gilles Dolivet; René-Jean Bensadoun; Marc Hamoir; Bernard Géry; Morbize Julieron; Marine Castaing; Etienne Bardet; Vincent Grégoire; Jean Bourhis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  'When will I see you again?' Using local recurrence data to develop a regimen for routine surveillance in post-treatment head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  S E Lester; R G Wight
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Negative predictive value of surveillance PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  M McDermott; M Hughes; T Rath; J T Johnson; D E Heron; G J Kubicek; S W Kim; R L Ferris; U Duvvuri; J P Ohr; B F Branstetter
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Routine long-term follow-up in patients treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity. Does it make sense?

Authors:  A V de Visscher; J J Manni
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-09

9.  Negative Predictive Value of NI-RADS Category 2 in the First Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  P Wangaryattawanich; B F Branstetter; M Hughes; D A Clump; D E Heron; T J Rath
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Importance of clinical and radiological follow-up in head and neck cancers.

Authors:  S Saussez; C Dekeyser; M P Thill; G Chantrain
Journal:  B-ENT       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.082

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adding MR Diffusion Imaging and T2 Signal Intensity to Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 2 and 3 in Primary Sites of Postsurgical Oral Cavity Carcinoma Provides Incremental Diagnostic Value.

Authors:  A Jajodia; G Mandal; V Yadav; J Khoda; J Goyal; S Pasricha; S Puri; A Dewan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.966

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.