Literature DB >> 11588315

Role of conventional angiography in evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis demonstrated by Doppler ultrasound in general practice.

A I Qureshi1, M F Suri, Z Ali, S H Kim, R D Fessler, A J Ringer, L R Guterman, J L Budny, L N Hopkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that patients with carotid stenosis who are candidates for endarterectomy can be effectively identified on the basis of carotid Doppler ultrasound alone. Before widespread acceptance of this policy, the accuracy of carotid Doppler ultrasound outside selected centers and clinical trials needs to be evaluated. We performed a 12-month prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler ultrasound in identifying patients for carotid intervention in general practice settings.
METHODS: Each patient referred to our endovascular service for diagnostic angiography to evaluate for carotid stenosis was interviewed and examined by a neurologist. Subjects consisted of symptomatic patients with >/=50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with >/=60% stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Information pertaining to demographic and cerebrovascular risk factors and the results of the carotid Doppler ultrasound were recorded. The severity of stenosis on angiograms was measured with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria by a blinded observer. The results of both studies were compared to determine the relative accuracy of ultrasound results.
RESULTS: Of 130 patients (mean age, 69+/-8.8 years) who met Doppler ultrasound criteria, 22 (17%) and 8 patients (6%) were found to have 30% to 49% or <30% stenosis by angiography, respectively. The positive predictive value of carotid Doppler ultrasound for identifying appropriate symptomatic candidates for carotid intervention (angiographic stenosis >/=50%) was 80%, with a false-positive value of 20%. The positive predictive value of carotid Doppler ultrasound for identifying appropriate asymptomatic candidates for carotid intervention (angiographic stenosis >/=60%) was 59%, with a false-positive value of 41%. Carotid endarterectomy or angioplasty and stent placement were undertaken subsequently in 60 (46%) of the patients. In 94 patients who underwent cerebral angiography alone, no complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The present accuracy of carotid Doppler ultrasound in general practice does not justify its use as the sole basis of selecting appropriate patients for carotid intervention. Given the relatively low rate of associated morbidity with present day techniques, additional confirmatory studies such as angiography should be performed in every patient before a decision regarding intervention is made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588315     DOI: 10.1161/hs1001.096613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  14 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Ingitha Borisch; Markus Horn; Bernhard Butz; Niels Zorger; Bogdan Draganski; Thilo Hoelscher; Ulrich Bogdahn; Johann Link
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Theodor Adla; Radka Adlova
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 3.  Therapeutic advances in interventional neurology.

Authors:  Jawad F Kirmani; Nazli Janjua; Ammar Al Kawi; Shafiuddin Ahmed; Ismail Khatri; Ali Ebrahimi; Afshin A Divani; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-04

4.  Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography.

Authors:  E S Bartlett; T D Walters; S P Symons; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Correlation of carotid stenosis diameter and cross-sectional areas with CT angiography.

Authors:  E S Bartlett; S P Symons; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of supra-aortic arteries: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  A Korn; M Fenchel; B Bender; S Danz; C Thomas; D Ketelsen; C D Claussen; G Moonis; B Krauss; M Heuschmid; U Ernemann; H Brodoefel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Ischemic stroke: carotid and vertebral artery disease.

Authors:  P Vilela; A Goulão
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparative analysis of 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, color Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography in symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Hongkai Cui; Ruifang Yan; Zhansheng Zhai; Jipeng Ren; Zheng Li; Qiang Li; Shouying Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Henry J M Barnett; Heather E Meldrum; Michael Eliasziw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.