Literature DB >> 12583859

Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

Andrei V Alexandrov1.   

Abstract

The risk of ischemic stroke increases proportionately to the severity of carotid stenosis, and carotid endarterectomy is a durable procedure that reduces this risk. Although a combination of noninvasive tests, such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), have low misclassification rates compared with invasive angiography, the need for invasive angiography may not yet be obviated. Ultrasound appears to be a cost-effective screening strategy for a significant carotid stenosis that warrants angiographic confirmation and possible intervention. A combination of ultrasound and MRA appears to be the most common clinical pathway that can be accurate and cost-effective, if rigorous local validation of diagnostic criteria is performed. Ultrasound further supplements angiography by providing information about plaque morphology and physiologic measurements of collateralization of flow and vasomotor reactivity when additional tests, such as transcranial Doppler, are performed. Ultrasound and various angiographic imaging modalities have complementary value in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. Currently, more invasive angiograms are being performed, due to a variety of new experimental interventions such as angioplasty and stenting, a subject of current clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12583859     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-003-0082-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  55 in total

1.  Significance of sonographic tissue and surface characteristics of carotid plaques.

Authors:  T J Tegos; K J Kalomiris; M M Sabetai; E Kalodiki; A N Nicolaides
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography.

Authors:  D C Johnston; L B Goldstein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Results of carotid endarterectomy with prospective neurologist follow-up.

Authors:  S Chaturvedi; R Aggarwal; A Murugappan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Clinical significance of the flow gap in carotid magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  J E Heiserman; J M Zabramski; B P Drayer; P J Keller
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Performance of carotid ultrasound in evaluating candidates for carotid endarterectomy is optimized by an approach based on clinical outcome rather than accuracy.

Authors:  J L Wilterdink; E Feldmann; J D Easton; R Ward
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Prevention of ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jesse Weinberger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  A broad diagnostic battery for bedside transcranial Doppler to detect flow changes with internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion.

Authors:  I Christou; R A Felberg; A M Demchuk; J C Grotta; W S Burgin; M Malkoff; A V Alexandrov
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Ultrasonographic features of carotid plaque and the risk of subsequent neurologic deficits.

Authors:  A V Sterpetti; R D Schultz; R J Feldhaus; K L Davenport; M Richardson; C Farina; W J Hunter
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Effect of contralateral severe stenosis or carotid occlusion on duplex criteria of ipsilateral stenoses: comparative study of various duplex parameters.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; B K Richmond; P A Robinson; S Khan; J A Pollack; S Alberts
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 10.  Carotid angioplasty and stenting: new horizons.

Authors:  C R Gomez
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.967

View more
  5 in total

1.  Immediate evaluation of angioplasty and stenting results in supra-aortic arteries by use of a Doppler-tipped guidewire.

Authors:  Nina Ghosh; Donatella Tampieri; Denis Melancon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Risk factors for periprocedural complications in carotid artery stenting without filter protection: A serial diffusion-weighted MRI study.

Authors:  Hilmar Krapf; Thomas Nägele; Andreas Kastrup; Udo Bühring; Eckehard Grönewäller; Martin Skalej; Wilhelm Küker
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

4.  Clinical relevance of gemstone spectral CT in the diagnosis of carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jing-Jian Wang; Shu-Jie Fan; Long-Long Wang; Yan-Zhong Gao; Xiao-Juan Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Alison Halliday; M Sofia Massa; Paul Sherliker; Rachel Clack; Dylan R Morris; Robert Clarke; Gert J de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Sarah Lewington
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.