Literature DB >> 16418349

Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography.

E S Bartlett1, T D Walters, S P Symons, A J Fox.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Carotid artery stenosis quantification uses percent diameter ratios from conventional angiography. Multidetector high-speed CT angiography (CTA) allows direct millimeter measurement of carotid stenosis. We hypothesize a linear relationship between millimeter stenosis measurements and derived percent, alleviating cumbersome ratio calculations.
METHODS: Two neuroradiologists separately reviewed CTAs of 268 carotid arteries, blinded to other information. The narrowest portion of each carotid stenosis was measured in millimeters from axial source images. Distal internal carotid arteries (ICAs) were measured beyond the bulb, where walls are parallel. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)-style ratios were calculated for each ICA, except for suspected near-occlusions. Interobserver agreement was calculated for all measurements. Correlation coefficients were calculated comparing millimeter and derived percent stenosis, followed by regression analysis. Sensitivity and specificity values tested validity.
RESULTS: Interobserver agreement correlations were excellent, from 0.78 to 0.89 (2-tailed P </= .01). Excellent reader correlation permitted averaging of millimeter stenosis and distal ICA measurements, which were then used to calculate mean percent stenosis. Stenosis assessment was confidently performed from source images even with calcification. Regression analysis of mean percent as a function of mean millimeter stenosis shows a linear relationship, correlating 1.3 mm to 70% and 2.2 mm to 50% NASCET-style stenosis (Pearson's correlation of -0.95; n = 136). Direct millimeter measurement defining severe stenosis (70% or greater) has sensitivity of 88.2%, specificity of 92.4%, and negative predicted value of 98.2%.
CONCLUSION: There is a linear relationship between millimeter carotid stenosis diameter and derived percent stenosis. This allows prediction of NASCET-type percent from millimeter stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418349      PMCID: PMC7976065     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  31 in total

1.  Evaluation of cross-sectional luminal morphology in carotid atherosclerotic disease by use of spiral CT angiography.

Authors:  C Porsche; L Walker; D Mendelow; D Birchall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.

Authors:  B Randoux; B Marro; F Koskas; M Duyme; M Sahel; A Zouaoui; C Marsault
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Mark J W Koelemay; Paul J Nederkoorn; Johannes B Reitsma; Charles B Majoie
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Use of a C-arm system to generate true three-dimensional computed rotational angiograms: preliminary in vitro and in vivo results.

Authors:  R Fahrig; A J Fox; S Lownie; D W Holdsworth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis.

Authors:  J E Dix; A J Evans; D F Kallmes; A H Sobel; C D Phillips
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  J P Carpenter; F J Lexa; J T Davis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Variability of Doppler US measurements along the common carotid artery: effects on estimates of internal carotid arterial stenosis in patients with angiographically proved disease.

Authors:  V S Lee; B S Hertzberg; M J Workman; T P Smith; M A Kliewer; D M DeLong; B A Carroll
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; M Eliasziw; S A Gutnikov; A J Fox; D W Taylor; M R Mayberg; C P Warlow; H J M Barnett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 1--Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  E Johansson; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography.

Authors:  Hasan K Kabul; Klaus D Hagspiel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography--does gender matter?

Authors:  David P Friedman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Simplification of the residual lumen geometry in measuring carodid stenosis.

Authors:  Gernot Schulte-Altedorneburg; Frank J Ahlhelm
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Correlation of carotid stenosis diameter and cross-sectional areas with CT angiography.

Authors:  E S Bartlett; S P Symons; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusion by using CT angiography.

Authors:  E S Bartlett; T D Walters; S P Symons; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Classification of carotid stenosis by millimeter CT angiography measures: effects of prevalence and gender.

Authors:  E S Bartlett; T D Walters; S P Symons; R I Aviv; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?

Authors:  J Weber; P Veith; B Jung; G Ihorst; O Moske-Eick; S Meckel; H Urbach; C A Taschner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Computed tomography angiography intraluminal filling defect is predictive of internal carotid artery free-floating thrombus.

Authors:  A Jaberi; C Lum; P Stefanski; R Thornhill; D Iancu; W Petrcich; F Momoli; C Torres; D Dowlatshahi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  The role of CT and MRI in the assessment of peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  Franz von Ziegler; Marco A Costa
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.