Literature DB >> 11578290

Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy.

S M Griffin1, P J Lamb, S M Dresner, D L Richardson, N Hayes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcome of mediastinal leaks following radical oesophagectomy with a stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.
METHODS: Some 291 consecutive patients underwent two-phase subtotal oesophagectomy with gastric interposition for malignancy. Patients with clinical suspicion of a leak were investigated with contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients (6.5 per cent) developed a proven mediastinal leak at a median of 8 (range 3-30) days following surgery. Contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy identified that 13 patients had an isolated leak from the oesophagogastric anastomosis and two had widespread leakage secondary to gastrotomy-line dehiscence. Endoscopy revealed a further four patients with gastric necrosis in whom contrast radiology was normal. In six patients the diagnosis of leakage followed an apparently normal routine contrast examination on day 5-8. All 13 isolated anastomotic leaks were managed non-operatively with targeted mediastinal drainage, intravenous antibiotics and antifungal therapy, nasogastric decompression and enteral nutrition; the mortality rate was 15 per cent (two of 13). Patients with gastrotomy dehiscence or gastric necrosis had a more severe clinical picture; they were managed with repeat thoracotomy and either revision of the conduit or resection and exclusion. Despite early intervention four of the six patients died.
CONCLUSION: Routine postoperative contrast radiology cannot be recommended. On clinical suspicion of a leak patients require both contrast radiology and endoscopic evaluation. Isolated anastomotic leaks can be managed successfully with non-operative treatment, whereas more extensive leaks from the gastric conduit require revisional surgery which carries a high mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11578290     DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01918.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  44 in total

1.  The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Joerg Doerfer; Thomas Meyer; Peter Klein; Nathaniel Melling; Alexander G Kerscher; Werner Hohenberger; Joerg Ow Pelz
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-11-11

2.  Endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy for esophageal defects.

Authors:  Gunnar Loske; Tobias Schorsch; Christian Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Removable and repositionable covered metal self-expandable stents for leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery: experiences in a tertiary referral hospital.

Authors:  Bart J M Leenders; Arnold Stronkhorst; Frans J Smulders; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Lennard P L Gilissen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Role of stenting in gastrointestinal benign and malignant diseases.

Authors:  Benedetto Mangiavillano; Nico Pagano; Monica Arena; Stefania Miraglia; Pierluigi Consolo; Giuseppe Iabichino; Clara Virgilio; Carmelo Luigiano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

Review 5.  [Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection : Definition and validation of a new severity grading classification].

Authors:  A Schaible; T Schmidt; M Diener; U Hinz; P Sauer; D Wichmann; A Königsrainer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Transnasal inner drainage: an option for managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Keisuke Kosumi; Yoshifumi Baba; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Takahiro Akiyama; Kazuto Harada; Hironobu Shigaki; Yu Imamura; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Ventilatory and intensive care requirements following oesophageal resection.

Authors:  S A Robertson; R J E Skipworth; D L Clarke; T J Crofts; A Lee; A C de Beaux; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Serial CRP levels following oesophagectomy: a marker for anastomotic dehiscence.

Authors:  Peter McAnena; Colm Neary; Conor Doyle; Michael J Kerin; Oliver J McAnena; Chris Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Role of endoscopy to predict a leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Anja Schaible; Alexis Ulrich; Ulf Hinz; Markus W Büchler; Peter Sauer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Bodo Schniewind; Clemens Schafmayer; Gesa Voehrs; Jan Egberts; Witigo von Schoenfels; Tobias Rose; Roland Kurdow; Alexander Arlt; Mark Ellrichmann; Christian Jürgensen; Stefan Schreiber; Thomas Becker; Jochen Hampe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.