BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcome of mediastinal leaks following radical oesophagectomy with a stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. METHODS: Some 291 consecutive patients underwent two-phase subtotal oesophagectomy with gastric interposition for malignancy. Patients with clinical suspicion of a leak were investigated with contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (6.5 per cent) developed a proven mediastinal leak at a median of 8 (range 3-30) days following surgery. Contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy identified that 13 patients had an isolated leak from the oesophagogastric anastomosis and two had widespread leakage secondary to gastrotomy-line dehiscence. Endoscopy revealed a further four patients with gastric necrosis in whom contrast radiology was normal. In six patients the diagnosis of leakage followed an apparently normal routine contrast examination on day 5-8. All 13 isolated anastomotic leaks were managed non-operatively with targeted mediastinal drainage, intravenous antibiotics and antifungal therapy, nasogastric decompression and enteral nutrition; the mortality rate was 15 per cent (two of 13). Patients with gastrotomy dehiscence or gastric necrosis had a more severe clinical picture; they were managed with repeat thoracotomy and either revision of the conduit or resection and exclusion. Despite early intervention four of the six patients died. CONCLUSION: Routine postoperative contrast radiology cannot be recommended. On clinical suspicion of a leak patients require both contrast radiology and endoscopic evaluation. Isolated anastomotic leaks can be managed successfully with non-operative treatment, whereas more extensive leaks from the gastric conduit require revisional surgery which carries a high mortality rate.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcome of mediastinal leaks following radical oesophagectomy with a stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. METHODS: Some 291 consecutive patients underwent two-phase subtotal oesophagectomy with gastric interposition for malignancy. Patients with clinical suspicion of a leak were investigated with contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (6.5 per cent) developed a proven mediastinal leak at a median of 8 (range 3-30) days following surgery. Contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy identified that 13 patients had an isolated leak from the oesophagogastric anastomosis and two had widespread leakage secondary to gastrotomy-line dehiscence. Endoscopy revealed a further four patients with gastric necrosis in whom contrast radiology was normal. In six patients the diagnosis of leakage followed an apparently normal routine contrast examination on day 5-8. All 13 isolated anastomotic leaks were managed non-operatively with targeted mediastinal drainage, intravenous antibiotics and antifungal therapy, nasogastric decompression and enteral nutrition; the mortality rate was 15 per cent (two of 13). Patients with gastrotomy dehiscence or gastric necrosis had a more severe clinical picture; they were managed with repeat thoracotomy and either revision of the conduit or resection and exclusion. Despite early intervention four of the six patients died. CONCLUSION: Routine postoperative contrast radiology cannot be recommended. On clinical suspicion of a leak patients require both contrast radiology and endoscopic evaluation. Isolated anastomotic leaks can be managed successfully with non-operative treatment, whereas more extensive leaks from the gastric conduit require revisional surgery which carries a high mortality rate.
Authors: Joerg Doerfer; Thomas Meyer; Peter Klein; Nathaniel Melling; Alexander G Kerscher; Werner Hohenberger; Joerg Ow Pelz Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2010-11-11
Authors: Bart J M Leenders; Arnold Stronkhorst; Frans J Smulders; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Lennard P L Gilissen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: S A Robertson; R J E Skipworth; D L Clarke; T J Crofts; A Lee; A C de Beaux; S Paterson-Brown Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Peter McAnena; Colm Neary; Conor Doyle; Michael J Kerin; Oliver J McAnena; Chris Collins Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Bodo Schniewind; Clemens Schafmayer; Gesa Voehrs; Jan Egberts; Witigo von Schoenfels; Tobias Rose; Roland Kurdow; Alexander Arlt; Mark Ellrichmann; Christian Jürgensen; Stefan Schreiber; Thomas Becker; Jochen Hampe Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 4.584