Gunnar Loske1, Tobias Schorsch, Christian Müller. 1. Department for General, Abdominal, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg gGmbH, Alfredstrasse 9, 22087, Hamburg, Germany. loske.chir@marienkrankenhaus.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic insufficiency in esophageal anastomosis and esophageal defects of other etiology are very severe complications. For anastomotic insufficiency in the rectum, endoscopic vacuum therapy has already been used successfully. The authors used vacuum therapy for anastomotic defects and other lesions of the esophagus. METHODS: Between November 2006 and September 2009, 10 patients (5 men and 5 women, ages 46-82 years) were treated with endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy for anastomotic insufficiency secondary to esophagectomy or gastrectomy (n = 5), iatrogenic esophageal perforation (n = 2), esophageal wall necrosis (n = 1), Boerhaave's syndrome (n = 1), and perforation of esophageal cancer (n = 1). RESULTS: After one to seven changes of the sponge at intervals of 2-7 days and a mean therapy duration of 12 days, the defects were healed in all the surviving patients. During treatment, the patients were fed via an intestinal tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), or enterally past the sponge. One patient died of intercurrent severe colitis. In three cases, a revision laparotomy was necessary at the beginning of treatment. No postinterventional stricture or functional relevant scar formation was observed during a follow-up period of 10-380 days after termination of the vacuum therapy. CONCLUSION: Esophageal anastomotic insufficiency and esophageal wall defects of other causes can be treated successfully with endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy.
BACKGROUND:Anastomotic insufficiency in esophageal anastomosis and esophageal defects of other etiology are very severe complications. For anastomotic insufficiency in the rectum, endoscopic vacuum therapy has already been used successfully. The authors used vacuum therapy for anastomotic defects and other lesions of the esophagus. METHODS: Between November 2006 and September 2009, 10 patients (5 men and 5 women, ages 46-82 years) were treated with endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy for anastomotic insufficiency secondary to esophagectomy or gastrectomy (n = 5), iatrogenic esophageal perforation (n = 2), esophageal wall necrosis (n = 1), Boerhaave's syndrome (n = 1), and perforation of esophageal cancer (n = 1). RESULTS: After one to seven changes of the sponge at intervals of 2-7 days and a mean therapy duration of 12 days, the defects were healed in all the surviving patients. During treatment, the patients were fed via an intestinal tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), or enterally past the sponge. One patient died of intercurrent severe colitis. In three cases, a revision laparotomy was necessary at the beginning of treatment. No postinterventional stricture or functional relevant scar formation was observed during a follow-up period of 10-380 days after termination of the vacuum therapy. CONCLUSION:Esophageal anastomotic insufficiency and esophageal wall defects of other causes can be treated successfully with endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy.
Authors: S H Roy-Choudhury; A A Nicholson; K R Wedgwood; R A Mannion; P C Sedman; C M Royston; D J Breen Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Felix B Langer; Etienne Wenzl; Gerhard Prager; Andreas Salat; Johannes Miholic; Thomas Mang; Johannes Zacherl Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: D Vallböhmer; A H Hölscher; M Hölscher; M Bludau; C Gutschow; D Stippel; E Bollschweiler; W Schröder Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Jonathan Loeck; Hans-Jürgen von Lücken; Adrian Münscher; Christian Theodor Müller; Gunnar Loske Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-03-14 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Bodo Schniewind; Clemens Schafmayer; Gesa Voehrs; Jan Egberts; Witigo von Schoenfels; Tobias Rose; Roland Kurdow; Alexander Arlt; Mark Ellrichmann; Christian Jürgensen; Stefan Schreiber; Thomas Becker; Jochen Hampe Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 4.584