Literature DB >> 27516076

Transnasal inner drainage: an option for managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Keisuke Kosumi1, Yoshifumi Baba1, Nobuyuki Ozaki1, Takahiro Akiyama1, Kazuto Harada1, Hironobu Shigaki1, Yu Imamura2, Masaaki Iwatsuki1, Naoya Yoshida1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Hideo Baba3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage, a serious complication of esophagectomy, continues to contribute to high surgery-related mortality. Management of anastomotic leakage has become a serious concern for surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of transnasal inner drainage using a Salem Sump tube for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.
METHODS: We inserted a Salem Sump tube into the esophagus through one nostril. By using a 0.035-inch guide wire under fluoroscopic guidance, we advanced this drainage tube into the abscess through the site of the anastomotic leakage. We also used upper endoscopy if necessary.
RESULTS: We performed transnasal inner drainage in five patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. The average interval from the operation to diagnosis of anastomotic leakage was 7.8 days (median: 7, range: 3-18 days). The average duration of drainage was 15.8 days (median: 16, range: 11-21 days). No patients required additional surgical treatment and there was no operative mortality. No stricture was observed during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Transnasal inner drainage is successful, and may decrease the duration of drainage and reduce surgery-related mortality caused by anastomotic leakage. Additionally, this technique enables treatment of abscesses that cannot be managed by percutaneous drainage because of their locations, and can be safely undertaken in most institutions. Transnasal inner drainage is a safe, useful, inexpensive, and minimally invasive method, which may be an option for management of post-esophagectomy anastomotic leakage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Complication; Esophagectomy; Transnasal inner drainage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27516076     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1489-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  19 in total

1.  Esophageal Bypass Using a Y-Shaped Gastric Tube for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Transabdominal Placement of the Decompression Tube.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Baba; Takahiko Akiyama; Keisuke Kosumi; Kazuto Harada; Hironobu Shigaki; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yasuo Sakamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Salvage oesophagectomy after local failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J Gardner-Thorpe; R H Hardwick; S J Dwerryhouse
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Masayuki Watanabe; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Shiro Iwagami; Junji Kurashige; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Endoscopic drainage of esophageal suture line leaks.

Authors:  J O Jorgensen; D R Hunt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy.

Authors:  S M Griffin; P J Lamb; S M Dresner; D L Richardson; N Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Treatment of anastomotic leaks with metallic stent after esophagectomies.

Authors:  E Eizaguirre; S Larburu; J I Asensio; A Rodriguez; J L Elorza; F Loyola; G Urdapilleta; J M E Navascués
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  Treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks by temporary stenting with self-expanding plastic stents.

Authors:  Y Y Dai; S Gretschel; O Dudeck; B Rau; P M Schlag; M Hünerbein
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  M Brangewitz; T Voigtländer; F A Helfritz; T O Lankisch; M Winkler; J Klempnauer; M P Manns; A S Schneider; J Wedemeyer
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  Jochen Wedemeyer; Andrea Schneider; Michael P Manns; Steffan Jackobs
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie S Blencowe; Sean Strong; Angus G K McNair; Sara T Brookes; Tom Crosby; S Michael Griffin; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is Prophylactic Cervical Drainage Effective in Patients Undergoing McKeown Esophagectomy Reconstructed Through the Retrosternal Route with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy?

Authors:  Daisuke Fujiwara; Masayuki Watanabe; Yasukazu Kanie; Suguru Maruyama; Kei Sakamoto; Akihiko Okamura; Jun Kanamori; Yu Imamura; Shinji Mine
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Dörte Wichmann; Stefano Fusco; Christoph R Werner; Sabrina Voesch; Benedikt Duckworth-Mothes; Ulrich Schweizer; Dietmar Stüker; Alfred Königsrainer; Karolin Thiel; Markus Quante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.