Literature DB >> 11564320

The constraints functional neuroimaging places on classical models of auditory word processing.

A L Giraud1, C J Price.   

Abstract

Several previous functional imaging experiments have demonstrated that auditory presentation of speech, relative to tones or scrambled speech, activate the superior temporal sulci (STS) bilaterally. In this study, we attempted to segregate the neural responses to phonological, lexical, and semantic input by contrasting activation elicited by heard words, meaningless syllables, and environmental sounds. Inevitable differences between the duration and amplitude of each stimulus type were controlled with auditory noise bursts matched to each activation stimulus. Half the subjects were instructed to say "okay" in response to presentation of all stimuli. The other half repeated back the words and syllables, named the source of the sounds, and said "okay" to the control stimuli (noise bursts). We looked for stimulus effects that were consistent across task. The results revealed that central regions in the STS were equally responsive to speech (words and syllables) and familiar sounds, whereas the posterior and anterior regions of the left superior temporal gyrus were more active for speech. The effect of semantic input was small but revealed more activation in the inferior temporal cortex for words and familiar sounds than syllables and noise. In addition, words (relative to syllables, sounds, and noise) enhanced activation in the temporo-parietal areas that have previously been linked to modality independent semantic processing. Thus, in cognitive terms, we dissociate phonological (speech) and semantic responses and propose that word specificity arises from functional integration among shared phonological and semantic areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11564320     DOI: 10.1162/08989290152541421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  32 in total

1.  Demand on verbal working memory delays haemodynamic response in the inferior prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Guillaume Thierry; Danielle Ibarrola; Jean-François Démonet; Dominique Cardebat
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Development of brain mechanisms for processing orthographic and phonologic representations.

Authors:  James R Booth; Douglas D Burman; Joel R Meyer; Darren R Gitelman; Todd B Parrish; M Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Is my mobile ringing? Evidence for rapid processing of a personally significant sound in humans.

Authors:  Anja Roye; Erich Schröger; Thomas Jacobsen; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Processing lexical semantic and syntactic information in first and second language: fMRI evidence from German and Russian.

Authors:  Shirley-Ann Rüschemeyer; Christian J Fiebach; Vera Kempe; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Shifts of effective connectivity within a language network during rhyming and spelling.

Authors:  Tali Bitan; James R Booth; Janet Choy; Douglas D Burman; Darren R Gitelman; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Courtney Driscoll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The orthography-specific functions of the left fusiform gyrus: evidence of modality and category specificity.

Authors:  Kyrana Tsapkini; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Functional neuroanatomy of non-verbal semantic sound processing in humans.

Authors:  A Engelien; O Tüscher; W Hermans; N Isenberg; D Eidelberg; C Frith; E Stern; D Silbersweig
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.