OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that diastolic mitral annular motion velocity, as determined by Doppler tissue imaging and left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity, is related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). METHODS: In 41 heart transplant recipients undergoing 151 myocardial biopsies, the following Doppler echocardiographic measurements were performed within one hour of biopsy: transmitral and pulmonary vein flow indices; mitral annular motion velocity indices; left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity. RESULTS: Late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (A(DTI)) and mitral annular systolic contraction velocity (SC(DTI)) were higher in patients with ISHLT < IIIA than in those with ISHLT >/= IIIA (A(DTI), 8.8 cm/s v 7.7 cm/s (p = 0.03); SC(DTI), 19.3 cm/s v 9.3 cm/s (p < 0.05)). Sensitivity and specificity of A(DTI) < 8.7 cm/s (the best cut off value) in predicting significant heart transplant rejection were 82% and 53%, respectively. Early diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (E(DTI)) and flow propagation velocity were not related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus is useful in diagnosing heart transplant rejection because a high late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity can reliably exclude severe rejection. However, a reduced late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity cannot predict severe rejection reliably because it is not specific enough.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that diastolic mitral annular motion velocity, as determined by Doppler tissue imaging and left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity, is related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). METHODS: In 41 heart transplant recipients undergoing 151 myocardial biopsies, the following Doppler echocardiographic measurements were performed within one hour of biopsy: transmitral and pulmonary vein flow indices; mitral annular motion velocity indices; left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity. RESULTS:Late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (A(DTI)) and mitral annular systolic contraction velocity (SC(DTI)) were higher in patients with ISHLT < IIIA than in those with ISHLT >/= IIIA (A(DTI), 8.8 cm/s v 7.7 cm/s (p = 0.03); SC(DTI), 19.3 cm/s v 9.3 cm/s (p < 0.05)). Sensitivity and specificity of A(DTI) < 8.7 cm/s (the best cut off value) in predicting significant heart transplant rejection were 82% and 53%, respectively. Early diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (E(DTI)) and flow propagation velocity were not related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus is useful in diagnosing heart transplant rejection because a high late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity can reliably exclude severe rejection. However, a reduced late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity cannot predict severe rejection reliably because it is not specific enough.
Authors: M Ishihara; H Sato; T Kawagoe; Y Shimatani; S Kurisu; K Nishioka; Y Kouno; T Umemura; S Nakamura Journal: Heart Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: J O Van Dobbenburgh; M C De Groot; N De Jonge; C Klöpping; J R Lahpor; S R Woolley; E O Robles De Medina; C J Van Echteld Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: D DeNofrio; R Rho; F J Morales; M Kamoun; J Kearns; C Dorozinsky; B R Rosengard; M A Acker; E Loh Journal: Transplantation Date: 2000-03-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: M H Yamani; R C Starling; M Goormastic; F Van Lente; N Smedira; P McCarthy; J B Young Journal: Transplantation Date: 2000-06-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: David R Okada; Maria R Molina; Maria Kohari; Esther E Vorovich; Anjali T Owens; Yuchi Han Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Ritu Sachdeva; Sadia Malik; Paul M Seib; Elizabeth A Frazier; Mario A Cleves Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Ravi Starzl; Gerald Brandacher; W P Andrew Lee; Jaime Carbonell; Wensheng Zhang; Jonas Schnider; Vijay Gorantla; Stefan Schneeberger; Xin Xiao Zheng Journal: Clin Dev Immunol Date: 2013-02-13
Authors: Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz; Ludhmila A Hajjar; Fernando Bacal; Marco S Lofrano-Alves; Márcio S M Lima; Maria C Abduch; Marcelo L C Viera; Hsu P Chiang; Juliana B C Salviano; Isabela Bispo Santos da Silva Costa; Julia Tizue Fukushima; Joao C N Sbano; Wilson Mathias; Jeane M Tsutsui Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 2.062