Literature DB >> 11559685

Doppler tissue imaging for assessing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in heart transplant rejection.

S M Stengel1, Y Allemann, M Zimmerli, E Lipp, N Kucher, P Mohacsi, C Seiler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that diastolic mitral annular motion velocity, as determined by Doppler tissue imaging and left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity, is related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT).
METHODS: In 41 heart transplant recipients undergoing 151 myocardial biopsies, the following Doppler echocardiographic measurements were performed within one hour of biopsy: transmitral and pulmonary vein flow indices; mitral annular motion velocity indices; left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity.
RESULTS: Late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (A(DTI)) and mitral annular systolic contraction velocity (SC(DTI)) were higher in patients with ISHLT < IIIA than in those with ISHLT >/= IIIA (A(DTI), 8.8 cm/s v 7.7 cm/s (p = 0.03); SC(DTI), 19.3 cm/s v 9.3 cm/s (p < 0.05)). Sensitivity and specificity of A(DTI) < 8.7 cm/s (the best cut off value) in predicting significant heart transplant rejection were 82% and 53%, respectively. Early diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (E(DTI)) and flow propagation velocity were not related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection.
CONCLUSIONS: Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus is useful in diagnosing heart transplant rejection because a high late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity can reliably exclude severe rejection. However, a reduced late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity cannot predict severe rejection reliably because it is not specific enough.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11559685      PMCID: PMC1729918          DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.4.432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  32 in total

1.  Evaluation of the potential role of color-coded tissue Doppler echocardiography in the detection of allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  S Mankad; S Murali; R L Kormos; W A Mandarino; J Gorcsan
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Management of pericardial effusion.

Authors:  J Soler-Soler; J Sagristà-Sauleda; G Permanyer-Miralda
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  D T Connelly
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Matching the right drug to the right patient in essential hypertension.

Authors:  M J Brown
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Role of stenting in coronary revascularisation.

Authors:  A H Gershlick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Impact of diabetes mellitus on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with single vessel disease.

Authors:  M Ishihara; H Sato; T Kawagoe; Y Shimatani; S Kurisu; K Nishioka; Y Kouno; T Umemura; S Nakamura
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Myocardial high-energy phosphate metabolism in heart transplant patients is temporarily altered irrespective of rejection.

Authors:  J O Van Dobbenburgh; M C De Groot; N De Jonge; C Klöpping; J R Lahpor; S R Woolley; E O Robles De Medina; C J Van Echteld
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns in 404 individuals without cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  S F de Marchi; M Bodenmüller; D L Lai; C Seiler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Detection of anti-HLA antibody by flow cytometry in patients with a left ventricular assist device is associated with early rejection following heart transplantation.

Authors:  D DeNofrio; R Rho; F J Morales; M Kamoun; J Kearns; C Dorozinsky; B R Rosengard; M A Acker; E Loh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  The impact of routine mycophenolate mofetil drug monitoring on the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  M H Yamani; R C Starling; M Goormastic; F Van Lente; N Smedira; P McCarthy; J B Young
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Motion artifacts in optical coherence tomography with frequency-domain ranging.

Authors:  S H Yun; G Tearney; J de Boer; B Bouma
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2004-06-28       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Clinical echocardiographic indices of left ventricular diastolic function correlate poorly with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at 1 year following heart transplantation.

Authors:  David R Okada; Maria R Molina; Maria Kohari; Esther E Vorovich; Anjali T Owens; Yuchi Han
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Doppler tissue imaging and catheter-derived measures are not independent predictors of rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ritu Sachdeva; Sadia Malik; Paul M Seib; Elizabeth A Frazier; Mario A Cleves
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Arrhythmias in the Heart Transplant Patient.

Authors:  David Hamon; Jane Taleski; Marmar Vaseghi; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Noel G Boyle
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

Review 5.  Review of the early diagnoses and assessment of rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Authors:  Ravi Starzl; Gerald Brandacher; W P Andrew Lee; Jaime Carbonell; Wensheng Zhang; Jonas Schnider; Vijay Gorantla; Stefan Schneeberger; Xin Xiao Zheng
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-02-13

Review 6.  Diagnostic performance of echocardiography for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Jun Zheng; Xudong Pan; Lizhong Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Usefulness of speckle tracking echocardiography and biomarkers for detecting acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz; Ludhmila A Hajjar; Fernando Bacal; Marco S Lofrano-Alves; Márcio S M Lima; Maria C Abduch; Marcelo L C Viera; Hsu P Chiang; Juliana B C Salviano; Isabela Bispo Santos da Silva Costa; Julia Tizue Fukushima; Joao C N Sbano; Wilson Mathias; Jeane M Tsutsui
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 8.  Non-invasive cardiac allograft rejection surveillance: reliability and clinical value for prevention of heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Usefulness and limitations of transthoracic echocardiography in heart transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Sergio Mondillo; Massimo Maccherini; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 2.062

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.