Literature DB >> 32889634

Non-invasive cardiac allograft rejection surveillance: reliability and clinical value for prevention of heart failure.

Michael Dandel1,2, Roland Hetzer3.   

Abstract

Allograft rejection-related acute and chronic heart failure (HF) is a major cause of death in heart transplant recipients. Given the deleterious impact of late recognized acute rejection (AR) or non-recognized asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection on short- and long-term allograft function improvement of AR surveillance and optimization of action strategies for confirmed AR can prevent AR-related allograft failure and delay the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, which is the major cause for HF after the first posttransplant year. Routine non-invasive monitoring of cardiac function can improve both detection and functional severity grading of AR. It can also be helpful in guiding the anti-AR therapy and timing of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs). The combined use of EMBs with non-invasive technologies and methods, which allow detection of subclinical alterations in myocardial function (e.g., tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography), reveal alloimmune activation (e.g., screening of complement-activating donor-specific antibodies and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA) and help in predicting the imminent risk of immune-mediated injury (e.g., gene expression profiling, screening of non-HLA antibodies, and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA), can ensure the best possible surveillance and management of AR. This article gives an overview of the current knowledge about the reliability and clinical value of non-invasive cardiac allograft AR surveillance. Particular attention is focused on the potential usefulness of non-invasive tools and techniques for detection and functional grading of early and late ARs in asymptomatic patients. Overall, the review aimed to provide a theoretical and practical basis for those engaged in this particularly demanding up-to-date topic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute cellular rejection; Antibody-mediated rejection; Cardiac imaging; Cardiac rejection surveillance; Echocardiography; Heart transplantation; Immune monitoring; Therapeutic decision-making; Ventricular function

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32889634     DOI: 10.1007/s10741-020-10023-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  122 in total

1.  Signal-averaged electrocardiography and detection of heart transplant rejection: comparison of time and frequency domain analyses.

Authors:  D Lacroix; S Kacet; P Savard; F Molin; J Dagano; A Pol; J Lekieffre
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Surface electrocardiography and histologic rejection following orthotopic heart transplantation.

Authors:  Robert E Eckart; Mark W Kolasa; Nancy A Khan; Michael D Kwan; Mark E Peele
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Efficacy of signal-averaged electrocardiography in the young orthotopic heart transplant patient to detect allograft rejection.

Authors:  M S Horenstein; S F Idriss; R M Hamilton; R J Kanter; P A Webster; P P Karpawich
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Electrocardiographic Correlates of Acute Allograft Rejection Among Heart Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Kathleen T Hickey; Robert R Sciacca; Belinda Chen; Barbara J Drew; David Pickham; Erik V Carter; Carmen Castillo; Lynn V Doering
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Ali Yilmaz; Ingrid Kindermann; Michael Kindermann; Felix Mahfoud; Christian Ukena; Anastasios Athanasiadis; Stephan Hill; Heiko Mahrholdt; Matthias Voehringer; Michael Schieber; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Michael Böhm; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac allograft rejection by intramyocardial electrogram recordings.

Authors:  H Warnecke; S Schüler; H J Goetze; G Matheis; U Süthoff; J Müller; U Tietze; R Hetzer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Daily noninvasive rejection monitoring improves long-term survival in pediatric heart transplantation.

Authors:  R Hetzer; E V Potapov; J Müller; M Loebe; M Hummel; Y Weng; H Warnecke; P E Lange
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Clinical heart transplantation without routine endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  H Warnecke; J Müller; T Cohnert; M Hummel; S Spiegelsberger; H K Siniawski; E Lieback; R Hetzer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Complications of endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant patients.

Authors:  C Baraldi-Junkins; H R Levin; E K Kasper; B K Rayburn; A Herskowitz; K L Baughman
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 10.  Non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Christopher A Miller; James E Fildes; Simon G Ray; Helen Doran; Nizar Yonan; Simon G Williams; Matthias Schmitt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bioinformatics Identification of Candidate Biomarkers in Endomyocardial Biopsy and Peripheral Blood for Cardiac Allograft Rejection.

Authors:  Kang Luo; Lin Li; Mingyao Meng; Yan Chen; Zongliu Hou
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 1.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.