Literature DB >> 10868634

The impact of routine mycophenolate mofetil drug monitoring on the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection.

M H Yamani1, R C Starling, M Goormastic, F Van Lente, N Smedira, P McCarthy, J B Young.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a unique immunosupressive agent that has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection. The utility of therapeutic drug monitoring on rejection prophylaxis and treatment is inconclusive. This study was undertaken to evaluate the incidence of rejection in relation to MMF trough level following heart transplantation.
METHODS: Between May 1998 and February 1999, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome of 215 heart transplant patients who had routine monitoring of MMF trough level at the time of scheduled endomyocardial biopsy. Patients were divided into three groups according to the time interval post transplant, and were evaluated in relation to the MMF trough level. Group I, 104 patients within 6 months of transplant; Group II, 90 patients, 6-12 months post transplant; and Group III, 71 patients beyond one year of transplant. Fifty patients had samples in more than one group. Rejection was defined as Grade > or = 3A based on ISHLT criteria. Mean follow-up period was 179+/-52 days.
RESULTS: A significantly decreased incidence of rejection was noted in the samples with MMF trough level > or = mg/l compared to those with less than 2 mg/l inpatients evaluated within the first year of transplant (Group I: 8.8% vs. 14.9%, Group II: 4.2% vs. 11.3%, both P=0.05). In the presence of therapeutic cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (FK) blood levels, the incidence of rejection decreased significantly when MMF trough level was > or = 2 mg/l compared to samples with MMF trough level <2 mg/l (3.6% vs. 14.4%, P=0.005). No significant difference was noted in the presence of subtherapeutic CSA or FK levels (15.4% vs. 13.9%, P=NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of MMF trough levels may play a role in the management of cardiac transplant recipients during the first year post transplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10868634     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200006150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplant recipients: is it necessary?

Authors:  Michel Mourad; Pierre Wallemacq; Josiane König; Evelyne Henry de Frahan; Djamila Chaib Eddour; Martine De Meyer; Jacques Malaise; Jean Paul Squifflet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Doppler tissue imaging for assessing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in heart transplant rejection.

Authors:  S M Stengel; Y Allemann; M Zimmerli; E Lipp; N Kucher; P Mohacsi; C Seiler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Immunosuppressive therapy in older cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Arezu Zejnab Aliabadi; Andreas Oliver Zuckermann; Michael Grimm
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum.

Authors:  J Michael Tredger; Nigel W Brown; Anil Dhawan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and estimation of exposure using multiple linear regression equations in Chinese renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  Pei-Jun Zhou; Da Xu; Zi-Cheng Yu; Xiang-Hui Wang; Kun Shao; Ju-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid as a Precision Medicine Tool for Heart Transplant Patients: Results of an Observational Pharmacokinetic Pilot Study.

Authors:  Francesco Lo Re; Jacopo Angelini; Sandro Sponga; Chiara Nalli; Antonella Zucchetto; Jessica Biasizzo; Ugolino Livi; Massimo Baraldo
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.525

10.  Association of ABCC2 Haplotypes to Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Daniel Brazeau; Calvin J Meaney; Joseph D Consiglio; Gregory E Wilding; Louise M Cooper; Rocco C Venuto; Kathleen M Tornatore
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.860

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.