BACKGROUND: Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) often have elevated levels of panel reactive antibodies (PRA). The clinical significance of anti-human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies detected by flow cytometry in PRA negative patients remains unclear. METHODS: Eighteen patients who underwent LVAD placement as a successful bridge to HT had standard anti-human globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity and retrospective flow cytometry assays performed to detect class I anti-HLA antibodies. A positive flow result was defined as a fluorescent ratio of 23:1 versus a negative control. RESULTS: Six patients had anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry. Univariate analysis demonstrated more moderate-severe rejection episodes (ISHLT > or = IIIA) at 2 months (0.83+/-0.75 vs. 0; P=0.04) and a trend toward decreased time to first rejection (61+/-17 vs. 225+/-62 days; P=0.06) in these patients. No differences were observed in donor-recipient HLA mismatch or 1 year Kaplan-Meier survival between patients with or without anti-HLA antibodies. CONCLUSION: Despite a negative PRA, LVAD patients with class I anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry have a greater incidence of moderate-severe rejection in the first 2 months after HT. Flow cytometry may be a useful clinical tool in screening PRA negative LVAD patients before transplantation. Patients with positive anti-HLA antibody screening by flow cytometry may require more intensive immunosuppression in the early post-HT period.
BACKGROUND:Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) often have elevated levels of panel reactive antibodies (PRA). The clinical significance of anti-human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies detected by flow cytometry in PRA negative patients remains unclear. METHODS: Eighteen patients who underwent LVAD placement as a successful bridge to HT had standard anti-human globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity and retrospective flow cytometry assays performed to detect class I anti-HLA antibodies. A positive flow result was defined as a fluorescent ratio of 23:1 versus a negative control. RESULTS: Six patients had anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry. Univariate analysis demonstrated more moderate-severe rejection episodes (ISHLT > or = IIIA) at 2 months (0.83+/-0.75 vs. 0; P=0.04) and a trend toward decreased time to first rejection (61+/-17 vs. 225+/-62 days; P=0.06) in these patients. No differences were observed in donor-recipient HLA mismatch or 1 year Kaplan-Meier survival between patients with or without anti-HLA antibodies. CONCLUSION: Despite a negative PRA, LVAD patients with class I anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry have a greater incidence of moderate-severe rejection in the first 2 months after HT. Flow cytometry may be a useful clinical tool in screening PRA negative LVAD patients before transplantation. Patients with positive anti-HLA antibody screening by flow cytometry may require more intensive immunosuppression in the early post-HT period.
Authors: George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Arman Kilic; Eric S Weiss; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Kevin P Daly; Stephanie F Chandler; Christopher S Almond; Tajinder P Singh; Helen Mah; Edgar Milford; Gregory S Matte; Heather J Bastardi; John E Mayer; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Elizabeth D Blume Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2013-08-06