Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Engaging patients in medical decision making.

Literature DB >> 11557690

Engaging patients in medical decision making.

R L Kravitz, J Melnikow.

Abstract

Entities: Species

Keywords: Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year: 2001 PMID： 11557690 PMCID： PMC1121170 DOI： 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.584

Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ ISSN： 0959-8138

× No keyword cloud information.

12 in total

1. Thresholds for taking antihypertensive drugs in different professional and lay groups: questionnaire survey.

Authors: N Steel
Journal: BMJ Date: 2000-05-27

Review 2. How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?

Authors: A A Montgomery; T Fahey
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 2001-09

3. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors: C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal: JAMA Date: 1999 Dec 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272

4. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Authors: L F Degner; L J Kristjanson; D Bowman; J A Sloan; K C Carriere; J O'Neil; B Bilodeau; P Watson; B Mueller
Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.

Authors: A J Lloyd
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 2001-09

Review 6. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.

Authors: A M O'Connor; A Rostom; V Fiset; J Tetroe; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; M Holmes-Rovner; M Barry; J Jones
Journal: BMJ Date: 1999-09-18

7. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine.

Authors: E J Cassel
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1982-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245

8. Regaining the initiative. Forging a new model of the patient-physician relationship.

Authors: J Balint; W Shelton
Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-03-20 Impact factor: 56.272

9. Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation. Benefit or harm?

Authors: J A Carrese; L A Rhodes
Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272

10. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease.

Authors: S H Kaplan; S Greenfield; J E Ware
Journal: Med Care Date: 1989-03 Impact factor: 2.983

15 in total

Review 1. Time for change.

Authors: M A Branthwaite
Journal: BMJ Date: 2005-09-24

2. Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique.

Authors: Jennifer Tio; Adam LaCaze; W Neil Cottrell
Journal: Pharm World Sci Date: 2006-12-23

Review 3. Social ecological predictors of prostate-specific antigen blood test and digital rectal examination in black American men.

Authors: V Diane Woods; Susanne B Montgomery; R Patti Herring; Robert W Gardner; Daniel Stokols
Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 1.798

Engaging patients in medical decision making.

1. Thresholds for taking antihypertensive drugs in different professional and lay groups: questionnaire survey.

Review 2. How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?

3. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

4. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Review 5. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.

Review 6. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.

7. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine.

8. Regaining the initiative. Forging a new model of the patient-physician relationship.

9. Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation. Benefit or harm?

10. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease.

Review 1. Time for change.

2. Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique.

Review 3. Social ecological predictors of prostate-specific antigen blood test and digital rectal examination in black American men.

4. The interplay between autonomy and dignity: summarizing patients voices.

Review 5. Predicting preferences: a neglected aspect of shared decision-making.

6. Patient, consumer, client, or customer: what do people want to be called?

7. Patient safety: what about the patient?

8. Colorectal cancer patients' attitudes towards involvement in decision making.

9. The implications of autonomy: Viewed in the light of efforts to uphold patients dignity and integrity.

10. Making the "right" health care decisions: why values matter.