Literature DB >> 7650807

Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation. Benefit or harm?

J A Carrese1, L A Rhodes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the Navajo perspective regarding the discussion of negative information and to consider the limitations of dominant Western bioethical perspectives.
DESIGN: Focused ethnography.
SETTING: Navajo Indian reservation in northeast Arizona. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four Navajo informants, including patients, biomedical health care providers, and traditional healers.
RESULTS: Informants explained that patients and providers should think and speak in a positive way and avoid thinking or speaking in a negative way; 86% of those questioned considered advance care planning a dangerous violation of traditional Navajo values. These findings are consistent with hózhó, the most important concept in traditional Navajo culture, which combines the concepts of beauty, goodness, order, harmony, and everything that is positive or ideal.
CONCLUSIONS: Discussing negative information conflicts with the Navajo concept hózhó and was viewed as potentially harmful by these Navajo informants. Policies complying with the Patient Self-determination Act, which are intended to expose all hospitalized Navajo patients to advance care planning, are ethically troublesome and warrant reevaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Indian Health Service; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7650807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  51 in total

1.  Care of dying patients: beyond symptom management.

Authors:  S Z Pantilat
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-10

2.  Research ethics committees: a regional approach.

Authors:  C C Macpherson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-04

Review 3.  Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities.

Authors:  S M Davis; R Reid
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Engaging patients in medical decision making.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; J Melnikow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-15

5.  What the Navajo culture teaches about informed consent.

Authors:  Alicia Hall
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2002-09

Review 6.  Bioethics in a multicultural world: medicine and morality in pluralistic settings.

Authors:  Leigh Turner
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-06

7.  Persisting differences in truth telling throughout the world.

Authors:  Antonella Surbone
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Guidelines for Teaching Cross-Cultural Clinical Ethics: Critiquing Ideology and Confronting Power in the Service of a Principles-Based Pedagogy.

Authors:  Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 9.  Advance Care Planning and HIV Infection in the Era of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Review.

Authors:  Aroonsiri Sangarlangkarn; Jessica S Merlin; Rodney O Tucker; Amy S Kelley
Journal:  Top Antivir Med       Date:  2016 Dec-2017 Jan

10.  Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers.

Authors:  Latifat Apatira; Elizabeth A Boyd; Grace Malvar; Leah R Evans; John M Luce; Bernard Lo; Douglas B White
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.