Literature DB >> 11533437

How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?

A A Montgomery1, T Fahey.   

Abstract

The shared model of medical decision making has been proposed as the preferred method of determining patients' treatment. However, agreement may be more difficult to achieve if patients' and clinicians' preferences are polarised. The aim of this paper is to explore how closely patients and clinicians agree in their preferences for different treatment options. Only studies that made quantifiable estimates of preferences were included. There is some evidence that patients and health professionals often do not agree on treatment preference in the areas of cardiovascular disease, cancer, obstetrics and gynaecology, and acute respiratory illness. However, the magnitude and direction of these differences vary and may depend on the condition of interest. Most of the research to date is cross sectional; longitudinal research is required to investigate whether preferences change over time and are related to treatment choice, adherence to medication if taken, and health outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11533437      PMCID: PMC1765739          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.0100039..

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  20 in total

Review 1.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

Authors:  C Charles; T Whelan; A Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Thresholds for taking antihypertensive drugs in different professional and lay groups: questionnaire survey.

Authors:  N Steel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

3.  Antibiotics for respiratory tract symptoms in general practice.

Authors:  T Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Practice guidelines for clinical prevention: do patients, physicians and experts share common ground?

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; E Hudon; D Roberge; R Pineault; D Forté; J Légaré
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

6.  The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis.

Authors:  J Protheroe; T Fahey; A A Montgomery; T J Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-20

7.  British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary.

Authors:  L E Ramsay; B Williams; G D Johnston; G A MacGregor; L Poston; J F Potter; N R Poulter; G Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-04

8.  Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies.

Authors:  L J Frewer; B Salter; N Lambert
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

9.  Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; R Gwyn; R Grol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

10.  Influence of patients' expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study.

Authors:  J Macfarlane; W Holmes; R Macfarlane; N Britten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-08
View more
  53 in total

1.  Engaging patients in medical decision making.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; J Melnikow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-15

2.  More on patients' preferences in treating atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A Montgomery; T Fahey; J Protheroe; T J Peters
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors.

Authors:  Rebecca E Say; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

4.  Proximity to disease and perception of utility: physicians' vs patients' assessment of treatment options for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Lindsay Kennedy Brown; Akbar K Waljee; Peter D R Higgins; Jennifer F Waljee; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique.

Authors:  Jennifer Tio; Adam LaCaze; W Neil Cottrell
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-12-23

6.  Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: assessing variations in surgeon opinion through a national survey.

Authors:  Loren Berman; Alan Dardik; Elizabeth H Bradley; Richard J Gusberg; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Exception reporting as a quality marker.

Authors:  Kevork Hopayian
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  The role of outpatient facilities in explaining variations in risk-adjusted readmission rates between hospitals.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Michael Baiocchi; Jeffrey H Silber; Orit Even-Shoshan; Gabriel J Escobar; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework.

Authors:  Christian D Helfrich; Yu-Fang Li; Nancy D Sharp; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  The relationship between patient and practitioner expectations and preferences and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Elaine Thomas; Jonathan C Hill; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.