Literature DB >> 16922061

Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.

Lawrence Brancazio1, Catherine T Best, Carol A Fowler.   

Abstract

We report four experiments designed to determine whether visual information affects judgments of acoustically-specified nonspeech events as well as speech events (the "McGurk effect"). Previous findings have shown only weak McGurk effects for nonspeech stimuli, whereas strong effects are found for consonants. We used click sounds that serve as consonants in some African languages, but that are perceived as nonspeech by American English listeners. We found a significant McGurk effect for clicks presented in isolation that was much smaller than that found for stop-consonant-vowel syllables. In subsequent experiments, we found strong McGurk effects, comparable to those found for English syllables, for click-vowel syllables, and weak effects, comparable to those found for isolated clicks, for excised release bursts of stop consonants presented in isolation. We interpret these findings as evidence that the potential contributions of speech-specific processes on the McGurk effect are limited, and discuss the results in relation to current explanations for the McGurk effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16922061      PMCID: PMC2773261          DOI: 10.1177/00238309060490010301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  28 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion.

Authors:  E Grossman; M Donnelly; R Price; D Pickens; V Morgan; G Neighbor; R Blake
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Brain activity during audiovisual speech perception: an fMRI study of the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Daniel E Callan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Discrimination tests of visually influenced syllables.

Authors:  L D Rosenblum; H M Saldaña
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

5.  Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler; D J Dekle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments.

Authors:  H M Saldaña; L D Rosenblum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

7.  Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.

Authors:  J Driver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

Review 9.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Leonardo Fogassi; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  A comparison of bound and unbound audio-visual information processing in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; J Christopher Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Asymmetries in unimodal visual vowel perception: The roles of oral-facial kinematics, orientation, and configuration.

Authors:  Matthew Masapollo; Linda Polka; Lucie Ménard; Lauren Franklin; Mark Tiede; James Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Audiovisual speech perception: A new approach and implications for clinical populations.

Authors:  Julia Irwin; Lori DiBlasi
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2017-03-26

3.  Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.708

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.