Literature DB >> 11536729

Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.

S K Mehta1, S K Mishra, D L Pierson.   

Abstract

Airborne fungi were monitored at five sample sites with the Burkard portable, the RCS Plus, and the SAS Super 90 air samplers; the Andersen 2-stage impactor was used for comparison. All samplers were calibrated before being used simultaneously to collect 100-liter samples at each site. The Andersen and Burkard samplers retrieved equivalent volumes of airborne fungi; the SAS Super 90 and RCS Plus measurements did not differ from each other but were significantly lower than those obtained with the Andersen or Burkard samplers. Total fungal counts correlated linearly with Cladosporium and Penicillium counts. Alternaria species, although present at all sites, did not correlate with total count or with amounts of any other fungal genera. Sampler and location significantly influenced fungal counts, but no interactions between samplers and locations were found.

Keywords:  NASA Center JSC; NASA Discipline Environmental Health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 11536729      PMCID: PMC167961          DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.5.1835-1838.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.

Authors:  P A Jensen; W F Todd; G N Davis; P V Scarpino
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1992-10

2.  New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne particles.

Authors:  A A ANDERSEN
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine.

Authors:  P S Thorne; M S Kiekhaefer; P Whitten; K J Donham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Environmental mycology and its importance to public health.

Authors:  S K Mishra; L Ajello; D G Ahearn; H A Burge; V P Kurup; D L Pierson; D L Price; R A Samson; R S Sandhu; B Shelton
Journal:  J Med Vet Mycol       Date:  1992

5.  Evaluation of standard and modified sampling heads for the International PBI Surface Air System bioaerosol samplers.

Authors:  P A Jensen
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1995-03

6.  The performance of the Biotest RCS centrifugal air sampler.

Authors:  S Clark; V Lach; O M Lidwell
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Evaluation of the Andersen viable impactor for single stage sampling.

Authors:  W Jones; K Morring; P Morey; W Sorenson
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1985-05

8.  Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling.

Authors:  M P Buttner; L D Stetzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  A study of air microbe levels in different areas of a hospital.

Authors:  Ginés Ortiz; Genoveva Yagüe; Manuel Segovia; Vicente Catalán
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  A qualitative and quantitative study monitoring airborne fungal flora in the kidney transplant unit.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Afshari; Majid Riazipour; Reza Kachuei; Mojtaba Teimoori; Behzad Einollahi
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2013-03-30

3.  Comparison of the Results of Studies of Air Pollution Fungi Using the SAS Super 100, MAS 100, and Air IDEAL.

Authors:  Cecylia Łukaszuk; Elżbieta Krajewska-Kułak; Andrzej Guzowski; Wojciech Kułak; Bogumiła Kraszyńska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.