Literature DB >> 1456208

Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.

P A Jensen1, W F Todd, G N Davis, P V Scarpino.   

Abstract

The need to quantify airborne microorganisms in the commercial microbiology industry (biotechnology) and during evaluations of indoor air quality, infectious disease outbreaks, and agriculture health investigations has shown there is a major technological void in bioaerosol sampling techniques to measure and identify viable and nonviable aerosols. As commercialization of microbiology increases and diversifies, it is increasingly necessary to assess occupational exposure to bioaerosols. Meaningful exposure estimates, by using area or environmental samplers, can only be ensured by the generation of data that are both precise and accurate. The Andersen six-stage viable (microbial) particle sizing sampler (6-STG) and the Ace Glass all-glass impinger-30 (AGI-30) have been suggested as the samplers of choice for the collection of viable microorganisms by the International Aerobiology Symposium and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Some researchers consider these samplers inconvenient for evaluating industrial bioprocesses and indoor or outdoor environments. Alternative samplers for the collection of bioaerosols are available; however, limited information has been reported on their collection efficiencies. A study of the relative sampling efficiencies of eight bioaerosol samplers has been completed. Eight samplers were individually challenged with a bioaerosol, created with a Collison nebulizer, of either Bacillus subtilis or Escherichia coli. The samplers were evaluated under controlled conditions in a horizontal bioaerosol chamber. During each experimental run, simultaneous samples were collected with a reference AGI-30 to verify the concentration of microorganisms in the chamber from run to run and day to day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1456208     DOI: 10.1080/15298669291360319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.

Authors:  S K Mehta; S K Mishra; D L Pierson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Containment of bioaerosol infection risk by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and its applicability to point-of-care settings.

Authors:  Padmapriya P Banada; Satheesh K Sivasubramani; Robert Blakemore; Catharina Boehme; Mark D Perkins; Kevin Fennelly; David Alland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Inactivation of viruses in bubbling processes utilized for personal bioaerosol monitoring.

Authors:  I E Agranovski; A S Safatov; A I Borodulin; O V Pyankov; V A Petrishchenko; A N Sergeev; A P Agafonov; G M Ignatiev; A A Sergeev; V Agranovski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Source tracking aerosols released from land-applied class B biosolids during high-wind events.

Authors:  Carolina Baertsch; Tania Paez-Rubio; Emily Viau; Jordan Peccia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Impaction onto a Glass Slide or Agar versus Impingement into a Liquid for the Collection and Recovery of Airborne Microorganisms.

Authors:  A Juozaitis; K Willeke; S A Grinshpun; J Donnelly
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of methods for detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms collected by liquid impingement.

Authors:  S Terzieva; J Donnelly; V Ulevicius; S A Grinshpun; K Willeke; G N Stelma; K P Brenner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evaluation of physical sampling efficiency for cyclone-based personal bioaerosol samplers in moving air environments.

Authors:  Wei-Chung Su; Alexander D Tolchinsky; Bean T Chen; Vladimir I Sigaev; Yung Sung Cheng
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-07-26

8.  Field sampling of indoor bioaerosols.

Authors:  Jennie Cox; Hamza Mbareche; William G Lindsley; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.908

9.  Accuracy, precision, and method detection limits of quantitative PCR for airborne bacteria and fungi.

Authors:  Denina Hospodsky; Naomichi Yamamoto; Jordan Peccia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Optimization of a sampling system for recovery and detection of airborne porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and swine influenza virus.

Authors:  J R Hermann; S J Hoff; K J Yoon; A C Burkhardt; R B Evans; J J Zimmerman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.