Literature DB >> 11533439

Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies.

L J Frewer1, B Salter, N Lambert.   

Abstract

Treatment selection is now much more consumer driven than in the past. However, there is a need to develop investigative methodological approaches that are sensitive to differences in patient preferences if full account is to be taken of what the patient sees as the best option in terms of different possible treatments available for a particular condition. Previous attitude research has been criticised because it does not provide insight into reasons why people hold different preferences or beliefs. A methodology is described which allows people to describe their concerns and values associated with different treatment options in their own words. This is the repertory grid method of eliciting personal constructs used in conjunction with generalised Procrustes analysis (GPA). An example of the use of this methodology is provided, drawn from research directed towards understanding people's beliefs about genetic technologies. A possible application of the method to understanding treatment preferences related to type 2 diabetes is also discussed. It is concluded that the use of innovative methodologies is essential if our understanding of patient preferences regarding treatment options is to have a significant impact on patient quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11533439      PMCID: PMC1765738          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.0100050..

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  14 in total

1.  Recommendations of dietitians for overcoming barriers to dietary adherence in individuals with diabetes.

Authors:  A R Williamson; A E Hunt; J F Pope; N M Tolman
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.140

Review 2.  New strategies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E Lipkin
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1999-03

Review 3.  Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 4.  How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?

Authors:  A A Montgomery; T Fahey
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

5.  Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics.

Authors:  Lynn J Frewer; Chaya Howard; Richard Shepherd
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  1997

6.  Locus of control, social support, and adherence to the diabetes regimen.

Authors:  L M Tillotson; M S Smith
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.140

7.  What the public thinks about biotechnology.

Authors:  B Zechendorf
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1994-09

Review 8.  The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.

Authors:  A J Lloyd
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 9.  Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.

Authors:  A Robinson; R Thomson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

10.  Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper.

Authors:  N Dudley
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?

Authors:  A A Montgomery; T Fahey
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

2.  The risks of eating and drinking.

Authors:  Susan B T Wilkinson; Gene Rowe; Nigel Lambert
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique.

Authors:  Jennifer Tio; Adam LaCaze; W Neil Cottrell
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-12-23

4.  How can qualitative research be utilised in the NHS when re-designing and commissioning services?

Authors:  Karen L Barker
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2015-02

5.  Exploring the beliefs of heart failure patients towards their heart failure medicines and self care activities.

Authors:  Matthew Percival; W Neil Cottrell; Rohan Jayasinghe
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-06-21

Review 6.  Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.

Authors:  A Robinson; R Thomson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

7.  Reasons underpinning patients' preferences for various angina treatments.

Authors:  Nigel Lambert; Gene Rowe; Ann Bowling; Shah Ebrahim; Michael Laurence; Jamie Dalrymple; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  General practitioners' perceptions of the effectiveness of medical interventions: an exploration of underlying constructs.

Authors:  Florian Vogt; David Armstrong; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Older home-care patients' preferred approaches to depression care: a pilot study.

Authors:  Denise C Fyffe; Ellen L Brown; Jo Anne Sirey; Elizabeth G Hill; Martha L Bruce
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.254

10.  Are elderly people with co-morbidities involved adequately in medical decision making when hospitalised? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Anne W Ekdahl; Lars Andersson; Ann-Britt Wiréhn; Maria Friedrichsen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.