Literature DB >> 8651843

The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening.

A M Wolf1, J F Nasser, A M Wolf1, J B Schorling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the many uncertainties surrounding screening for prostate cancer, authorities recommend that patients be involved in the screening decision.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of informed consent on patient interest in undergoing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening.
METHODS: Men 50 years or older with no prior PSA testing and no history of prostate cancer presenting to 1 of 4 university-affiliated primary care practices were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either a scripted informational intervention simulating an informed consent presentation (intervention group, n = 103) or a single sentence about the PSA (control group, n = 102). The main outcome measure was patient interest in undergoing PSA screening measured on a 5-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: Patients who received the informational intervention were significantly less interested in undergoing PSA screening than controls (mean difference in interest, 0.8 on 5-point scale, P < .001). Informed patients were much less likely to indicate high interest in screening (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.60; P < .001). In a multivariate model, family history of prostate cancer was associated with increased interest and advancing age with decreased interest in PSA screening, but the informational intervention remained the strongest predictor of interest.
CONCLUSIONS: Among primary care patients of predominantly lower socioeconomic status, those who received informed consent were significantly less interested in PSA screening than those who did not. For physicians who offer the PSA as a screening test, this finding highlights the importance of apprising patients of the associated benefits, burdens, and uncertainties and allowing them to participate in the screening decision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8651843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  46 in total

1.  Towards a philosophy of public health.

Authors:  D L Weed
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan; Iona Heath; David Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

Review 3.  The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

5.  Time for evidence-based screening?

Authors:  L Smeeth
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Prostate carcinoma: clarification through clinical insight and molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  F J Meyers; R W DeVere White
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-06

7.  Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference?

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Rong Li; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; David Nelson; David Radosevich; Sean Nugent; Ann B Flood; Nancy Dillon; Jeremy Holtzman; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patient-Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment: New Evidence From the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Soumitra S Bhuyan; Aastha Chandak; Niodita Gupta; Sudhir Isharwal; Chad LaGrange; Asos Mahmood; Dan Gentry
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.