Tristan R Osborn1, J Randall Curtis2, Elizabeth L Nielsen2, Anthony L Back3, Sarah E Shannon4, Ruth A Engelberg5. 1. Department of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 3. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 4. Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: rengel@u.washington.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One in fi ve deaths in the United States occurs in the ICU, and many of these deaths are experienced as less than optimal by families of dying people. The current study investigated the relationship between family satisfaction with ICU care and overall ratings of the quality of dying as a means of identifying targets for improving end-of-life experiences for patients and families. METHODS: This multisite cross-sectional study surveyed families of patients who died in the ICU in one of 15 hospitals in western Washington State. Measures included the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) and the Single-Item Quality of Dying (QOD-1) questionnaires. Associations between FS-ICU items and the QOD-1 were examined using multivariate linear regression controlling for patient and family demographics and hospital site. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned for 1,290 of 2,850 decedents (45%). Higher QOD-1 scores were significantly associated (all P < .05) with (1) perceived nursing skill and competence (β= 0.15), (2) support for family as decision-makers ( β= 0.10), (3) family control over the patient’s care( β= 0.18), and (4) ICU atmosphere (β= 0.12). FS-ICU items that received low ratings and correlated with higher QOD-1 scores (ie, important items with room for improvement) were (1) support of family as decision-maker, (2) family control over patient’s care, and (3) ICU atmosphere. CONCLUSIONS: Increased support for families as decision-makers and for their desired level of control over patient care along with improvements in the ICU atmosphere were identified as aspects of the ICU experience that may be important targets for quality improvement. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00685893; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: One in fi ve deaths in the United States occurs in the ICU, and many of these deaths are experienced as less than optimal by families of dying people. The current study investigated the relationship between family satisfaction with ICU care and overall ratings of the quality of dying as a means of identifying targets for improving end-of-life experiences for patients and families. METHODS: This multisite cross-sectional study surveyed families of patients who died in the ICU in one of 15 hospitals in western Washington State. Measures included the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) and the Single-Item Quality of Dying (QOD-1) questionnaires. Associations between FS-ICU items and the QOD-1 were examined using multivariate linear regression controlling for patient and family demographics and hospital site. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned for 1,290 of 2,850 decedents (45%). Higher QOD-1 scores were significantly associated (all P < .05) with (1) perceived nursing skill and competence (β= 0.15), (2) support for family as decision-makers ( β= 0.10), (3) family control over the patient’s care( β= 0.18), and (4) ICU atmosphere (β= 0.12). FS-ICU items that received low ratings and correlated with higher QOD-1 scores (ie, important items with room for improvement) were (1) support of family as decision-maker, (2) family control over patient’s care, and (3) ICU atmosphere. CONCLUSIONS: Increased support for families as decision-makers and for their desired level of control over patient care along with improvements in the ICU atmosphere were identified as aspects of the ICU experience that may be important targets for quality improvement. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00685893; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Judith E Nelson; Therese B Cortez; J Randall Curtis; Dana R Lustbader; Anne C Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Karen J Brasel; Margaret L Campbell; David E Weissman; Kathleen A Puntillo Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.918
Authors: Rebecca W Johnson; L Kristin Newby; Christopher B Granger; Wendy A Cook; Eric D Peterson; Melvin Echols; Wanda Bride; Bradi B Granger Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Patsy D Treece; Lois Downey; Danae Dotolo; Sarah E Shannon; Anthony L Back; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ellen B Clarke; J Randall Curtis; John M Luce; Mitchell Levy; Marion Danis; Judith Nelson; Mildred Z Solomon Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Daren K Heyland; Graeme M Rocker; Peter M Dodek; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Elsie Konopad; Deborah J Cook; Sharon Peters; Joan E Tranmer; Christopher J O'Callaghan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Douglas B White; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Bernard Lo; J Randall Curtis Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Daniel Schwarzkopf; Susanne Behrend; Helga Skupin; Isabella Westermann; Niels C Riedemann; Rüdiger Pfeifer; Albrecht Günther; Otto W Witte; Konrad Reinhart; Christiane S Hartog Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-02-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Irene P Jongerden; Arjen J Slooter; Linda M Peelen; Hester Wessels; Colette M Ram; Jozef Kesecioglu; Margriet M Schneider; Diederik van Dijk Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Oliver Kumpf; Jan-Peter Braun; Alexander Brinkmann; Hanswerner Bause; Martin Bellgardt; Frank Bloos; Rolf Dubb; Clemens Greim; Arnold Kaltwasser; Gernot Marx; Reimer Riessen; Claudia Spies; Jörg Weimann; Gabriele Wöbker; Elke Muhl; Christian Waydhas Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2017-08-01