Literature DB >> 19782530

The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Lois Downey1, J Randall Curtis, William E Lafferty, Jerald R Herting, Ruth A Engelberg.   

Abstract

We used exploratory factor analysis within the confirmatory analysis framework, and data provided by family members and friends of 205 decedents in Missoula, Montana, to construct a model of latent-variable domains underlying the Quality of Dying and Death questionnaire (QODD). We then used data from 182 surrogate respondents, who were survivors of Seattle decedents, to verify the latent-variable structure. Results from the two samples suggested that survivors' retrospective ratings of 13 specific aspects of decedents' end-of-life experience served as indicators of four correlated, but distinct, latent-variable domains: Symptom Control, Preparation, Connectedness, and Transcendence. A model testing a unidimensional domain structure exhibited unsatisfactory fit to the data, implying that a single global quality measure of dying and death may provide insufficient evidence for guiding clinical practice, evaluating interventions to improve quality of care or assessing the status or trajectory of individual patients. In anticipation of possible future research tying the quality of dying and death to theoretical constructs, we linked the inferred domains to concepts from identity theory and existential psychology. We conclude that research based on the current version of the QODD might benefit from the use of composite measures representing the four identified domains, but that future expansion and modification of the questionnaire are in order. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19782530      PMCID: PMC2815047          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  43 in total

Review 1.  Research design in end-of-life research: state of science.

Authors:  Linda K George
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2002-10

2.  Correspondence between patients' preferences and surrogates' understandings for dying and death.

Authors:  Ruth A Engelberg; Donald L Patrick; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Measuring the quality of dying in long-term care.

Authors:  Jean C Munn; Sheryl Zimmerman; Laura C Hanson; Christianna S Williams; Philip D Sloane; Elizabeth C Clipp; James A Tulsky; Karen E Steinhauser
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  How reliable are relatives' retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients and relatives' accounts compared.

Authors:  J Hinton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  The promise of a good death.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Perspectives on care at the close of life. Psychological considerations, growth, and transcendence at the end of life: the art of the possible.

Authors:  S D Block
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Evaluating the quality of dying and death.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Engelberg; J R Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 8.  Measuring quality of dying in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Lewis M Cohen; Michael J Germain
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Might massage or guided meditation provide "means to a better end"? Primary outcomes from an efficacy trial with patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Lois Downey; Paula Diehr; Leanna J Standish; Donald L Patrick; Leila Kozak; Douglass Fisher; Sean Congdon; William E Lafferty
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  Are bereaved family members a valid proxy for a patient's assessment of dying?

Authors:  I Higginson; P Priest; M McCarthy
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  46 in total

1.  Prevalence of symptoms at the end of life in an acute care hospital: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel Kobewka; Paul Ronksley; Dan McIsaac; Sunita Mulpuru; Alan Forster
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-03-09

2.  The importance and challenge of measuring family experience with end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The quality of dying and death: is it ready for use as an outcome measure?

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Defining a Good Death (Successful Dying): Literature Review and a Call for Research and Public Dialogue.

Authors:  Emily A Meier; Jarred V Gallegos; Lori P Montross Thomas; Colin A Depp; Scott A Irwin; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.105

5.  A new tool to assess relatives' experience of dying and death in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Isabell Fridh; Anna Forsberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  What Does the Staff Think?: Factors Associated With Clinical Staff Perceptions of What Constitutes High-Quality Dying and Death at a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.

Authors:  Rebecca Bennett; James Proudfoot
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.918

7.  Measuring family satisfaction with care and quality of dying in the intensive care unit: does patient age matter?

Authors:  Mithya Lewis-Newby; J Randall Curtis; Diane P Martin; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Using Nurse Ratings of Physician Communication in the ICU To Identify Potential Targets for Interventions To Improve End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Kathleen J Ramos; Lois Downey; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Patsy D Treece; Sarah E Shannon; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  The Influence of Race/Ethnicity and Education on Family Ratings of the Quality of Dying in the ICU.

Authors:  Janet J Lee; Ann C Long; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Measuring the quality of dying and death in the pediatric intensive care setting: the clinician PICU-QODD.

Authors:  Deborah E Sellers; Ree Dawson; Adena Cohen-Bearak; Mildred Z Solomond; Robert D Truog
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.