Literature DB >> 11531232

Phonological similarity in working memory.

D E Copeland1, G A Radvansky.   

Abstract

That phonologically similar words in a short-term memory test are more difficult to recall than phonologically dissimilar words is a well-known phenomenon. This effect is the phonological similarity decrement. In the present study, we examined whether this phonological similarity decrement is present when additional semantic information is available, as in a reading span test, as compared with a standard presentation, or in the context of an operation span test. The results revealed a phonological similarity facilitation. Phonologically similar words were remembered better than phonologically dissimilar words.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531232     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  3 in total

1.  Reversing the phonological similarity effect.

Authors:  J S Nairne; M R Kelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPAN.

Authors:  R CONRAD; A J HULL
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1964-11

Review 3.  Long-term working memory.

Authors:  K A Ericsson; W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

  3 in total
  14 in total

1.  [Phonological loop and low level phonological processing in preschool children].

Authors:  M Ptok; A Dunkelmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The recall of information from working memory. Insights from behavioural and chronometric perspectives.

Authors:  John N Towse; Nelson Cowan; Graham J Hitch; Neil J Horton
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  Memory decreases for prose, but not for poetry.

Authors:  Barbara Tillmann; W Jay Dowling
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

6.  Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.

Authors:  Brooke N Macnamara; Adam B Moore; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

7.  Adaptive choice between articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing in verbal working memory.

Authors:  Valérie Camos; Gerome Mora; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

8.  [Phonological loop and minimal pair discrimination in preschool children].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Lichte; N Buller; T Wink; C L Naumann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.

Authors:  Michael Chow; Brooke N Macnamara; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

10.  Interpreting potential markers of storage and rehearsal: Implications for studies of verbal short-term memory and neuropsychological cases.

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Robert H Logie; Christopher Jarrold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.