Literature DB >> 15597169

[Phonological loop and minimal pair discrimination in preschool children].

M Ptok1, C Lichte, N Buller, T Wink, C L Naumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phoneme discrimination tests based on presenting minimal pairs (MP) are frequently used to assess auditory processing. However test results may be influenced by other factors beside proper acoustic representation. Here we aim at determining whether working memory capacity (WMC) correlates with reproducing sets of MP.
METHODS: WMC was evaluated by memory span for digits in 161 preschool children. MP were either real words or non-words (logatoms). Both real word-MP and logatom-MP were presented in duplets or triplets. Children were asked to repeat what they had heard. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: All four test item blocks showed a significant positive correlation with WMC (group values). Some children with poor WMC performed sufficiently on MP discrimination and vice versa. DISCUSSION: Besides confirming the phonological similarity effect, our data indicates a significant interdependence between different processes and phonological representations. This must be taken into account when using MP tests for evaluating "auditory processing" in the clinical routine. However, poor WMC is neither necessary nor obligatory for poor phoneme discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15597169     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1046-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  22 in total

1.  [Decision processes at threshold levels during psychoacoustic testing].

Authors:  M Ptok
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  The phonological-similarity effect differentiates between two working memory tasks.

Authors:  Danean K MacAndrew; Roberta L Klatzky; Julie A Fiez; James L McClelland; James T Becke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

3.  [German phoneme contrast hierarchy. A study with preschool children].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Lichte; N Buller; T Wink; C L Naumann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  When reading is "readn" or somthn. Distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items in normal and disabled readers.

Authors:  C Elbro
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1998-09

5.  The use of internal speech by children with auditory processing problems.

Authors:  J Bench; R Maule
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  The fractionation of working memory.

Authors:  A Baddeley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children's receptive vocabularies.

Authors:  J Charles-Luce; P A Luce
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1995-10

Review 8.  Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia.

Authors:  F Ramus
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec

9.  Varieties of developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  A Castles; M Coltheart
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-05

10.  Modality and phonological similarity effects in serial recall: does one's own voice play a role?

Authors:  S E Gathercole; J M Gardiner; V H Gregg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Phonological processing in preschool children. Test standardisation].

Authors:  M Ptok; A Dunkelmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Stability of phoneme discrimination in preschool children].

Authors:  M Ptok; B Büssing; C Schwemmle; C Lichte
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [The first hearing aid increases mental capacity. Open controlled clinical trial as a pilot study].

Authors:  S Lehrl; R Funk; K Seifert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Auditory processing disorders : Consensus statement by the German Society for Phoniatry and Paedaudiology].

Authors:  A Nickisch; M Gross; R Schönweiler; V Uttenweiler; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; R Berger; H J Radü; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [The relationship between minimal pair reproduction and writing skills].

Authors:  M Ptok; R Meisen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Low level phonological processing and intelligence potential in preschool children].

Authors:  M Ptok; A Dunkelmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Number Recall in the K-ABC in children with auditory processing disorders. Criterion-related validity].

Authors:  C Kiese-Himmel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.284

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.