Literature DB >> 34741158

Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction.

Erica T Y Leung1, Cheuk-Lun Lee1,2, Xinyi Tian1, Kevin K W Lam1,2, Raymond H W Li1,2, Ernest H Y Ng1,2, William S B Yeung3, Philip C N Chiu4,5.   

Abstract

Sperm selection in the female reproductive tract (FRT) is sophisticated. Only about 1,000 sperm out of millions in an ejaculate reach the fallopian tube and thus have a chance of fertilizing an oocyte. In assisted reproduction techniques, sperm are usually selected using their density or motility, characteristics that do not reflect their fertilization competence and, therefore, might result in failure to fertilize the oocyte. Although sperm processing in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) bypasses many of the selection processes in the FRT, selection by the cumulus mass and the zona pellucida remain intact. By contrast, the direct injection of a sperm into an oocyte in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) bypasses all natural selection barriers and, therefore, increases the risk of transferring paternal defects such as fragmented DNA and genomic abnormalities in sperm to the resulting child. Research into surrogate markers of fertilization potential and into simulating the natural sperm selection processes has progressed. However, methods of sperm isolation - such as hyaluronic acid-based selection and microfluidic isolation based on sperm tactic responses - use only one or two parameters and are not comparable with the multistep sperm selection processes naturally occurring within the FRT. Fertilization-competent sperm require a panel of molecules, including zona pellucida-binding proteins and ion channel proteins, that enable them to progress through the FRT to achieve fertilization. The optimal artificial sperm selection method will, therefore, probably need to use a multiparameter tool that incorporates the molecular signature of sperm with high fertilization potential, and their responses to external cues, within a microfluidic system that can replicate the physiological processes of the FRT in vitro.
© 2021. Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34741158     DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00530-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  277 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of gamete and embryo transport through the fallopian tube.

Authors:  Horacio B Croxatto
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

Authors:  E Bosch; J J Espinós; F Fabregues; J Fontes; J García-Velasco; J Llácer; A Requena; M A Checa; J Bellver
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  The safety of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Claire O'Neill; Vivian Lu; Zev Rosenwaks; Gianpiero D Palermo
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Sperm selection based on electrostatic charge.

Authors:  Luke Simon; Shao-Qin Ge; Douglas T Carrell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

5.  Sperm selection for ICSI using annexin V.

Authors:  Sonja Grunewald; Uwe Paasch
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

Review 6.  The management of unexplained infertility: an evidence-based guideline from the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society.

Authors:  William Buckett; Sony Sierra
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 7.  Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lauren N C Johnson; Isaac E Sasson; Mary D Sammel; Anuja Dokras
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for patients requiring microsurgical sperm aspiration.

Authors:  S J Silber; Z P Nagy; J Liu; H Godoy; P Devroey; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  A unique view on male infertility around the globe.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Aditi Mulgund; Alaa Hamada; Michelle Renee Chyatte
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes?

Authors:  Denny Sakkas; Mythili Ramalingam; Nicolas Garrido; Christopher L R Barratt
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  2 in total

1.  Selection of fertilization strategies for different sperm parameters in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Lingling Qiu; Jinxiang Wu; Jing Chen; Hui Cao; Jingjing Cai; Xiaolan Huang; Ruiyun Wu; Yuanzhi Xie; Renata Finelli; Yali He; Suzhen Huang; Zhengyao Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

2.  Effect of inactivated COVID-19 vaccination on intrauterine insemination cycle success: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zijin Xu; Yixuan Wu; Yanshan Lin; Mingzhu Cao; Zhu Liang; Lei Li; Jiali Lin; Qian Chen; Jianqiao Liu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.