| Literature DB >> 34731459 |
Müge Keskin1, Emre Göksan Pabuçcu2, Tufan Arslanca2, Özgür Doğuş Demirkıran3, Recai Pabuçcu2.
Abstract
Male infertility contributes as the main factor in 30-50% of infertility cases. Conventional methods for sperm preparation have induced questioning of sperm recovery rates. The microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS) technique selects highly motile sperm with lower levels of SDF (sperm DNA fragmentation) compared to conventional sperm sorting techniques. This study aimed to determine whether utilizing this technique will reveal better embryo quality and euploidy rates in couples with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and high SDF in a new PGT-A (preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies) cycle. This retrospective study included couples referred to PGT-A for previous repeated ART (assisted reproductive techniques) cycle failures and with high SDF. In their new cycles, couples who accepted the technique were assigned to the MSS group, and the rest were managed with DGC (density-gradient centrifugation). Two groups were compared in terms of fertilization and euploidy rates, clinical miscarriage and live birth rates, the total number of blastocysts, and top quality blastocysts. There was no difference between the groups regarding fertilization rates, euploidy rates, clinical miscarriage, and live birth rates. The total number of blastocysts and top quality blastocysts were significantly higher in the MSS group. The MSS technique provides a higher number of top-quality blastocysts than DGC; however, neither euploidy nor live birth rates improved. Studies focusing on confounding factors to embryonic genomic status in the presence of high SDF are needed.Entities:
Keywords: Microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS); Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A); Repeated implantation failure (RIF); Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF)
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34731459 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00784-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Sci ISSN: 1933-7191 Impact factor: 3.060