Literature DB >> 11526279

Predictors of prostate carcinoma: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers.

E Kuligowska1, M A Barish, H M Fenlon, M Blake.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of detecting prostate cancer by using (a) gray-scale and color Doppler transrectal ultrasonography (US), (b) serum and excess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and (c) targeted and sextant transrectal US-guided biopsy. The relationship between US-detected neovascularity and tumor biologic activity was also evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, 544 patients with elevated PSA levels and/or abnormal digital rectal examination underwent transrectal US-guided sextant biopsy and targeted biopsy of US abnormalities. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of gray-scale US, color Doppler US, targeted biopsy, and PSA and excess PSA were calculated.
RESULTS: Gray-scale US depicted 78 (41.1%) of 190 cancers, whereas color Doppler US depicted 30 (15.8%) additional cancers. Targeted biopsy was used to detect 108 (56.8%) cancers, whereas sextant biopsy was used to detect 82 (43.2%) additional cancers. Although US-visible cancers had a higher Gleason grade than did cancers discovered at sextant biopsy (P <.05), 25 of the 66 cancers identified with sextant biopsy alone were Gleason grade 6 or higher. Color Doppler US-depicted hypervascularity correlated with biologically aggressive tumors. Excess PSA was normal in 58 (30.5%) cancers, with an accuracy of 67.3%, resulting in better prediction of prostate tumors than with serum PSA level alone.
CONCLUSION: Gray-scale transrectal US, even coupled with color Doppler US, is inadequate for prostate carcinoma screening; therefore, targeted biopsy should always be accompanied by complete sextant biopsy sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11526279     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2203001179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Optoacoustic imaging of the prostate: development toward image-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Mohammad A Yaseen; Sergey A Ermilov; Hans-Peter Brecht; Richard Su; André Conjusteau; Matthew Fronheiser; Brent A Bell; Massoud Motamedi; Alexander A Oraevsky
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  [Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Current status and prospects].

Authors:  M Zacharias; K V Jenderka; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Detection of prostate cancer with three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound: correlation with biopsy results.

Authors:  H-X Zhao; Q Zhu; Z-C Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Prospective evaluation of prostate with transrectal spectral Doppler with biopsy correlation: a clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  Syed M Danish Qaseem; Nitin P Ghonge; Bharat Aggarwal; Sanjeev Singhal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmad; Rui Cao; Tomy Varghese; Luc Bidaut; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

8.  Transrectal electrical impedance tomography of the prostate: spatially coregistered pathological findings for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Yuqing Wan; Andrea Borsic; John Heaney; John Seigne; Alan Schned; Michael Baker; Shaun Wason; Alex Hartov; Ryan Halter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Transrectal contrast enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M H Wink; J J M C H de la Rosette; C A Grimbergen; H Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  [Imaging procedures to diagnose prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Seitz; B Scher; M Scherr; D Tilki; B Schlenker; C Gratzke; A Schipf; P Stanislaus; U Müller-Lisse; O Reich; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.