Literature DB >> 21712427

Detection of prostate cancer with three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound: correlation with biopsy results.

H-X Zhao1, Q Zhu, Z-C Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
METHODS: A total of 112 patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or a positive digital rectal examination were evaluated using three-dimensional greyscale transrectal ultrasound (3D-GS TRUS) and three-dimensional power Doppler sonography (3D-PDS). Target biopsies were obtained together with 12 core systematic biopsies. Pathological results were correlated with the imaging data.
RESULTS: Cancers were detected in 269 biopsy sites from 41 patients. 229 sites of cancer were depicted by 3D-GS TRUS and 213 sites were depicted by 3D-PDS. 30 sites were missed by both 3D-GS TRUS and 3D-PDS. Abnormal prostate images depicted by 3D-GS TRUS and 3D-PDS were associated with lesions with a Gleason score of 6.9 or higher.
CONCLUSION: The detection rates of prostate cancer were significantly improved with 3D-GS TRUS and 3D-PDS on serum PSA levels >10 ng ml(-1) or 20 ng ml(-1). 3D-GS TRUS and 3D-PDS may improve the biopsy yield by determining appropriate sites for target and systematic biopsies. The abnormalities detected by 3D ultrasound were associated with moderate- and high-grade prostate cancers. However, based on the number of false-negative TRUS results, the use of systematic prostate biopsies should not be eliminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21712427      PMCID: PMC3474091          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/68418881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  18 in total

1.  Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer.

Authors:  E J Halpern; S E Strup
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Correlation of power Doppler with microvessel density in assessing prostate needle biopsy.

Authors:  N M Wilson; A M Masoud; H B Barsoum; M M Refaat; M I Moustafa; T A Kamal
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  Prostate cancer: to screen or not to screen?

Authors:  D E Neal; J L Donovan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Carcinoma of the prostate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies. Examined by the step-section technique.

Authors:  D P Byar; F K Mostofi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Origin and development of carcinoma in the prostate.

Authors:  J E McNeal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Predictors of prostate carcinoma: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers.

Authors:  E Kuligowska; M A Barish; H M Fenlon; M Blake
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Three-dimensional US of the prostate: early experience.

Authors:  U M Hamper; V Trapanotto; M R DeJong; S Sheth; C I Caskey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prostatic cancer: role of color Doppler imaging in transrectal sonography.

Authors:  A M Lavoipierre; R M Snow; M Frydenberg; D Gunter; G Reisner; P L Royce; G J Lavoipierre
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Value of power doppler and 3D vascular sonography as a method for diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  J L Sauvain; P Palascak; D Bourscheid; C Chabi; A Atassi; J M Bremon; R Palascak
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography: correlation of imaging and pathological examinations.

Authors:  K Shinohara; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Penzkofer; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Prostate cancer prediction using the random forest algorithm that takes into account transrectal ultrasound findings, age, and serum levels of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Li-Hong Xiao; Pei-Ran Chen; Zhong-Ping Gou; Yong-Zhong Li; Mei Li; Liang-Cheng Xiang; Ping Feng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Limiting overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer through an evaluation of the predictive value of transrectal and power Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  Jean Luc Sauvain; Elise Sauvain; Roger Papavero; Didier Louis; Paul Rohmer
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2016-09-29

5.  3D versus 2D Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Higher Cancer Detection Rate in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alexandre Peltier; Fouad Aoun; Fouad El-Khoury; Eric Hawaux; Ksenija Limani; Krishna Narahari; Nicolas Sirtaine; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-11-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.