Literature DB >> 11525460

Correlated responses to selection for faster development and early reproduction in Drosophila: the evolution of larval traits.

N G Prasad1, M Shakarad, D Anitha, M Rajamani, A Joshi.   

Abstract

Studies on selection for faster development in Drosophila have typically focused on the trade-offs among development time, adult weight, and adult life span. Relatively less attention has been paid to the evolution of preadult life stages and behaviors in response to such selection. We have earlier reported that four laboratory populations of D. melanogaster selected for faster development and early reproduction, relative to control populations, showed considerably reduced preadult development time and survivorship, dry weight at eclosion, and larval growth rates. Here we study the larval phase of these populations in greater detail. We show here that the reduction in development time after about 50 generations of selection is due to reduced duration of the first and third larval instars and the pupal stage, whereas the duration of the second larval instar has not changed. About 90% of the preadult mortality in the selected populations is due to larval mortality. The third instar larvae, pupae, and freshly eclosed adults of the selected populations weigh significantly less than controls, and this difference appears during the third larval instar. Thereafter, percentage weight loss during the pupal stage does not differ between selected and control populations. The minimum amount of time a larva must feed to subsequently complete development is lower in the selected populations, which also exhibit a syndrome of reduced energy expenditure through reduction in larval feeding rate, larval digging and foraging activity, and pupation height. Comparison of these results with those observed earlier in populations selected for adaptation to larval crowding and faster development under a different protocol from ours reveal differences in the evolved traits that suggest that the responses to selection for faster development are greatly affected by the larval density at which selection acts and on details of the selection pressures acting on the timing of reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11525460     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00658.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  28 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  The evolution of population stability as a by-product of life-history evolution.

Authors:  N G Prasad; Sutirth Dey; Mallikarjun Shakarad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Sex differences in dispersal syndrome are modulated by environment and evolution.

Authors:  Abhishek Mishra; Sudipta Tung; P M Shreenidhi; Mohammed Aamir Sadiq; V R Shree Sruti; Partha Pratim Chakraborty; Sutirth Dey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Enhancement of larval immune system traits as a correlated response to selection for rapid development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Punyatirtha Dey; Kanika Mendiratta; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Evolution of faster development does not lead to greater fluctuating asymmetry of sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Shakarad; N G Prasad; M Rajamani; A Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Larger bacterial populations evolve heavier fitness trade-offs and undergo greater ecological specialization.

Authors:  Yashraj Chavhan; Sarthak Malusare; Sutirth Dey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Circadian clocks and life-history related traits: is pupation height affected by circadian organization in Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Dhanashree A Paranjpe; D Anitha; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Stage-specific effects of candidate heterochronic genes on variation in developmental time along an altitudinal cline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julián Mensch; Valeria Carreira; Nicolás Lavagnino; Julieta Goenaga; Guillermo Folguera; Esteban Hasson; Juan José Fanara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.