Literature DB >> 11910118

Evolution of faster development does not lead to greater fluctuating asymmetry of sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila.

M Shakarad1, N G Prasad, M Rajamani, A Joshi.   

Abstract

Both strong directional selection and faster development are thought to destabilize development, giving rise to greater fluctuating asymmetry (FA), although there is no strong empirical evidence supporting this assertion. We compared FA in sternopleural bristle number in four populations of Drosophila melanogaster successfully selected for faster development from egg to adult, and in four control populations. The fraction of perfectly symmetric individuals was higher in the selected populations, whereas the FA levels did not differ significantly between selected and control populations, clearly indicating that directional selection for faster development has not led to increased FA in sternopleural bristle number in these populations. This may be because: (i) development time and FA are uncorrelated, (ii) faster development does result in FA, but selection has favoured developmentally stable individuals that can develop fast and still be symmetrical, or (iii) the increased fraction of symmetric individuals in the selected populations is an artifact of reduced body size. Although we cannot discriminate among these explanations, our results suggest that the relationship between development time, FA and fitness may be far more subtle than often thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11910118     DOI: 10.1007/bf02811412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  14 in total

1.  Evolution of reduced pre-adult viability and larval growth rate in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for shorter development time.

Authors:  N G Prasad; M Shakarad; V M Gohil; V Sheeba; M Rajamani; A Joshi
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Studies in quantitative inheritance. VI. Sternite chaeta number in Drosophila; a metameric quantitative character.

Authors:  E C REEVE; F W ROBERTSON
Journal:  Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl       Date:  1954

Review 3.  Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A P Møller; R Thornhill
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Developmental stability in relation to population density and breed of chickens Gallus gallus.

Authors:  A P Møller; G S Sanotra; K S Vestergaard
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations. II. Natural selection.

Authors:  M U Kearsey; B W Barnes
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Correlated responses to selection for faster development and early reproduction in Drosophila: the evolution of larval traits.

Authors:  N G Prasad; M Shakarad; D Anitha; M Rajamani; A Joshi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY, TRAIT VARIABILITY, TRAIT HERITABILITY, AND STRESS: A MULTIPLY REPLICATED EXPERIMENT ON COMBINED STRESSES IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Richard E Woods; Carla M Sgrò; Miriam J Hercus; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  THE EVOLUTION OF DEVELOPMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER SELECTED FOR POSTPONED SENESCENCE.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Dat T Hoang; Philip M Service; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Fluctuating asymmetry and human male life-history traits in rural Belize.

Authors:  D Waynforth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of directional selection for body size on fluctuating asymmetry in certain morphological traits in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  C Vishalakshi; B N Singh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Quantitative morphometrical analysis of a North African population of Drosophila melanogaster: sexual dimorphism, and comparison with European populations.

Authors:  M Chakir; H Negoua; B Moreteau; J R David
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 4.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Reproductive behaviour evolves rapidly when intralocus sexual conflict is removed.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bedhomme; Nagaraj G Prasad; Pan-Pan Jiang; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Facial asymmetry tracks genetic diversity among Gorilla subspecies.

Authors:  Kate McGrath; Amandine B Eriksen; Daniel García-Martínez; Jordi Galbany; Aida Gómez-Robles; Jason S Massey; Lawrence M Fatica; Halszka Glowacka; Keely Arbenz-Smith; Richard Muvunyi; Tara S Stoinski; Michael R Cranfield; Kirsten Gilardi; Chantal Shalukoma; Emmanuel de Merode; Emmanuel Gilissen; Matthew W Tocheri; Shannon C McFarlin; Yann Heuzé
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.530

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.