Literature DB >> 11522585

Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching.

B L Day1, P Brown.   

Abstract

To test whether the most rapid visually evoked reach adjustments are cortically organized in humans, we have measured their latency in a healthy subject with complete agenesis of the corpus callosum. This condition precludes direct communication between left and right cerebral cortices and so, in this subject, a purely cortical visuomotor process would be expected to produce longer-latency responses to a target that appears in the visual hemifield contralateral to the responding limb (crossed) compared with the ipsilateral hemifield (uncrossed). As predicted, when performing simple reaction time tasks that involved lifting a finger or an arm in response to a visual stimulus presented to either hemifield, this acallosal subject showed a significant crossed-uncrossed latency difference (mean 35.8 ms) that was not present in control subjects (group mean 2.2 ms). In contrast, when she reached for a target that unexpectedly jumped into either visual hemifield, the latencies of mid-flight adjustment were the same (approximately 120 ms) irrespective of either the target jump direction or which hand was used. This was not due to an early movement of the eyes bringing the target back on to the fovea since this subject's finger always deviated towards the new target position in advance of her eyes. Neither could it be explained by the use of ipsilateral corticospinal projections since transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex failed to evoke ipsilateral responses in arm or hand muscles. These results suggest that, even in humans, subcortical structures are involved in the fastest adjustments of the reaching arm made in response to fresh visual information. An additional finding in this subject was that, when reaching, the eye saccadic latency was greater by 36 ms on average when the target jumped right compared with left, irrespective of which hand was being used. This is the same value as the mean interhemispheric transfer time obtained in the simple reaction time tasks and may indicate right-hemispheric dominance for saccadic eye movement control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11522585     DOI: 10.1093/brain/124.9.1832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  29 in total

1.  Direct evidence for the contribution of the superior colliculus in the control of visually guided reaching movements in the cat.

Authors:  Jean-Hubert Courjon; Etienne Olivier; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Perceptual requirements for fast manual responses.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process.

Authors:  Martin Lakie; Ian D Loram
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Action-blindsight in healthy subjects after transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Mark Schram Christensen; Lasse Kristiansen; James B Rowe; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Authors:  Michael C Bajema; Colum D MacKinnon; Michael J Carter; Michael Kennefick; Sam Perlmutter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position.

Authors:  Alexandra Reichenbach; Axel Thielscher; Angelika Peer; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jean-Pierre Bresciani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The relationship between the implicit visuomotor control and the motor planning accuracy.

Authors:  Kosuke Numasawa; Takeshi Miyamoto; Tomohiro Kizuka; Seiji Ono
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Done in 100 ms: path-dependent visuomotor transformation in the human upper limb.

Authors:  Chao Gu; J Andrew Pruszynski; Paul L Gribble; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Sensorimotor anatomy of gait, balance, and falls.

Authors:  Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

10.  Modifying one's hand's trajectory when a moving target's orientation changes.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.