Literature DB >> 19675067

Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position.

Alexandra Reichenbach1, Axel Thielscher, Angelika Peer, Heinrich H Bülthoff, Jean-Pierre Bresciani.   

Abstract

Goal-directed movements are executed under the permanent supervision of the central nervous system, which continuously processes sensory afferents and triggers on-line corrections if movement accuracy seems to be compromised. For arm reaching movements, visual information about the hand plays an important role in this supervision, notably improving reaching accuracy. Here, we tested whether visual feedback of the hand affects the latency of on-line responses to an external perturbation when reaching for a visual target. Two types of perturbation were used: visual perturbation consisted in changing the spatial location of the target and kinesthetic perturbation in applying a force step to the reaching arm. For both types of perturbation, the hand trajectory and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of shoulder muscles were analysed to assess whether visual feedback of the hand speeds up on-line corrections. Without visual feedback of the hand, on-line responses to visual perturbation exhibited the longest latency. This latency was reduced by about 10% when visual feedback of the hand was provided. On the other hand, the latency of on-line responses to kinesthetic perturbation was independent of the availability of visual feedback of the hand. In a control experiment, we tested the effect of visual feedback of the hand on visual and kinesthetic two-choice reaction times--for which coordinate transformation is not critical. Two-choice reaction times were never facilitated by visual feedback of the hand. Taken together, our results suggest that visual feedback of the hand speeds up on-line corrections when the position of the visual target with respect to the body must be re-computed during movement execution. This facilitation probably results from the possibility to map hand- and target-related information in a common visual reference frame.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19675067      PMCID: PMC2768016          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.176362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  59 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Action and awareness in pointing tasks.

Authors:  Helen Johnson; Robert J Van Beers; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Control of fast-reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations.

Authors:  Andrea d'Avella; Alessandro Portone; Laure Fernandez; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adjustments of fast goal-directed movements in response to an unexpected inertial load.

Authors:  J B Smeets; C J Erkelens; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control.

Authors:  L G Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  14 in total

1.  Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics.

Authors:  Silvia Hua; Julia A Leonard; Alicia J Hilderley; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Frontal and parietal cortex contributions to action modification.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Lee H Stapp; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Temporal Evolution of Spatial Computations for Visuomotor Control.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Alexandra Reichenbach; Sae Franklin; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hip-abductor fatigue and single-leg landing mechanics in women athletes.

Authors:  Mary F Patrek; Thomas W Kernozek; John D Willson; Glenn A Wright; Scott T Doberstein
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Otolith Morphology: A Hidden Tool in the Taxonomic Study of Goatfishes (Teleostei: Perciformes: Mullidae).

Authors:  Sorour Echreshavi; Hamid Reza Esmaeili; Azad Teimori; Mohsen Safaie
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Fast and fine-tuned corrections when the target of a hand movement is displaced.

Authors:  Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Contributions of the PPC to online control of visually guided reaching movements assessed with fMRI-guided TMS.

Authors:  Alexandra Reichenbach; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Angelika Peer; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The effect of social context on the use of visual information.

Authors:  Stephan Streuber; Günther Knoblich; Natalie Sebanz; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Stephan de la Rosa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A dedicated binding mechanism for the visual control of movement.

Authors:  Alexandra Reichenbach; David W Franklin; Peter Zatka-Haas; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The role of differential delays in integrating transient visual and proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Cristina de la Malla; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.