Literature DB >> 11521768

Human auditory brainstem response to temporal gaps in noise.

L A Werner1, R C Folsom, L R Mancl, C L Syapin.   

Abstract

Gap detection is a commonly used measure of temporal resolution, although the mechanisms underlying gap detection are not well understood. To the extent that gap detection depends on processes within, or peripheral to, the auditory brainstem, one would predict that a measure of gap threshold based on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) would be similar to the psychophysical gap detection threshold. Three experiments were performed to examine the relationship between ABR gap threshold and gap detection. Thresholds for gaps in a broadband noise were measured in young adults with normal hearing, using both psychophysical techniques and electrophysiological techniques that use the ABR. The mean gap thresholds obtained with the two methods were very similar, although ABR gap thresholds tended to be lower than psychophysical gap thresholds. There was a modest correlation between psychophysical and ABR gap thresholds across participants. ABR and psychophysical thresholds for noise masked by temporally continuous, high-pass, or spectrally notched noise were measured in adults with normal hearing. Restricting the frequency range with masking led to poorer gap thresholds on both measures. High-pass maskers affected the ABR and psychophysical gap thresholds similarly. Notched-noise-masked ABR and psychophysical gap thresholds were very similar except that low-frequency, notched-noise-masked ABR gap threshold was much poorer at low levels. The ABR gap threshold was more sensitive to changes in signal-to-masker ratio than was the psychophysical gap detection threshold. ABR and psychophysical thresholds for gaps in broadband noise were measured in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss and in infants. On average, both ABR gap thresholds and psychophysical gap detection thresholds of listeners with hearing loss were worse than those of listeners with normal hearing, although individual differences were observed. Psychophysical gap detection thresholds of 3- and 6-month-old infants were an order of magnitude worse than those of adults with normal hearing, as previously reported; however, ABR gap thresholds of 3-month-old infants were no different from those of adults with normal hearing. These results suggest that ABR gap thresholds and psychophysical gap detection depend on at least some of the same mechanisms within the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11521768     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/058)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  14 in total

1.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Encoding of temporal features of auditory stimuli in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body and superior paraolivary nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  A Kadner; A S Berrebi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  Information Processing by Onset Neurons in the Cat Auditory Brainstem.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; William S Rhode
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-26

5.  Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer D Gay; Merri J Rosen; Julia Jones Huyck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-02

6.  Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  David L Horn; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Acoustically evoked auditory change complex in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a potential objective tool for identifying cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Jennifer Woodard; Lisa R Park; Debora R Hatch; Patricia Roush; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Development of subcortical speech representation in human infants.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Amplitude modulation detection and temporal modulation cutoff frequency in normal hearing infants.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Caitlin M Gerhards; Lynne A Werner; David L Horn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  N100 cortical potentials accompanying disrupted auditory nerve activity in auditory neuropathy (AN): effects of signal intensity and continuous noise.

Authors:  Henry J Michalewski; Arnold Starr; Fan-Gang Zeng; Andrew Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.