Literature DB >> 10615976

Long-term results of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty.

N Gschwend1, N H Scheier, A R Baehler.   

Abstract

Between 1978 and 1986, 59 patients received a GSB III elbow prosthesis, six of them in both elbows. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the underlying cause in 51 of the patients and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) in eight. Of these, 24 patients (28 prostheses) have since died; two, both operated on bilaterally, had had their implants for more than ten years and had already been assessed for inclusion in the long-term follow-up. Two patients, each with one elbow prosthesis, have been lost to follow-up and three males who are still living (two with PTOA, one with juvenile RA) had their prosthesis removed before ten years had elapsed. The remaining 32 patients (28 RA, 4 PTOA) with 36 GSB III elbows were examined clinically and radiologically after a mean period of 13.5 years. Pain was considerably reduced in 91.6%. Mobility was increased by 37 degrees in those with RA and by 67 degrees in those with PTOA. There were three cases of aseptic loosening and three of deep infection. The main complication was disassembly of the prosthetic component in nine elbows (13.8%). This last group included two patients with postoperative fractures unrelated to the operative technique and one with neuropathic arthritis. Ulnar neuritis occurred in two patients. Since 87.7% of all the GSB III prostheses implanted in this period remained in situ, our results are comparable with those for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615976     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.9495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  14 in total

Review 1.  Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK.

Authors:  D C Mackay; B Hudson; J R Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Infected total elbow arthroplasty treated by cemented arthrodesis.

Authors:  Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-22

3.  [Differences in elbow replacement in rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  K Schmidt; A Hilker; R K Miehlke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  What design and material factors impact the wear and corrosion performance in total elbow arthroplasties?

Authors:  Mark P Figgie; Timothy M Wright; Denise Drinkwater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Total elbow arthroplasty: history, current concepts, and future.

Authors:  Saccomanni Bernardino
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  The anconeus-triceps lateral flap approach for total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A Celli; P Bonucci
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 7.  [Dislocation after total elbow arthroplasty].

Authors:  M John; K Schenk; S Lieske; H W Neumann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Spontaneous displacement of olecranon fracture through geode salvaged by elbow replacement.

Authors:  Anuj Jaiswal; Raman Thakur; Jaikumar Relwani; Wallace Ogufere
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Total elbow arthroplasty: a radiographic outcome study.

Authors:  Xue Susan Bai; Jonelle M Petscavage-Thomas; Alice S Ha
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Systematic review of primary total elbow prostheses used for the rheumatoid elbow.

Authors:  J C T van der Lugt; P M Rozing
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.