Literature DB >> 22271163

3D morphometric analysis of 43 scapulae.

Xavier Ohl1, Fabien Billuart, Pierre-Yves Lagacé, Olivier Gagey, Nicola Hagemeister, Wafa Skalli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate knowledge of the scapular anatomy is fundamental for the preoperative evaluation but some bony landmarks are difficult to identify. Statistical approaches based on subject-specific parametric models could be used to overcome this difficulty. The aim of this study was to propose a quantitative parametric model of the scapula and to analyze correlations between descriptive morphologic parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three scapulae were scanned and reconstructed. Each 3D scapula was regionalized and a simple geometric element was best fitted on each region using least square method. Descriptive parameters of each region were obtained. Correlation and linear regression analyses were performed between all measurements in order to assess parameters that can be used as predictors of the other descriptive parameters.
RESULTS: Morphometric scapular measurements from 3D reconstructions were obtained. Correlation and linear regression analyses assessed correlations between the glenoid width and both the glenoid height and the acromial width. Also, we obtained correlation between the orientation of the inferior part of the acromion on the A-P view and on the axillary view. DISCUSSION: Parametric models are widely used in biomechanics for identifying anatomical landmarks or rotations centers of these structures. For the scapula, no such model is available. We elaborated a first parametric model of scapula based on a large database of 43 scapulae. Our morphometric measurements are very close to others founded in literature. Correlations obtained should help to progress toward relevant subject-specific models of the scapula based on reduced information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22271163     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-0933-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  24 in total

1.  Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan.

Authors:  D J Bokor; M D O'Sullivan; G J Hazan
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Characterization of acromial concavity. An in vitro computer analysis.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman; F J Kummer; S N Panos
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2000

3.  About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.

Authors:  L F De Wilde; B M Berghs; E Audenaert; G Sys; G O Van Maele; E Barbaix
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Variable osseous anatomy of costal surface of scapula and its implications in relation to snapping scapula syndrome.

Authors:  Anjali Aggarwal; Pratima Wahee; Aditya K Aggarwal; Daisy Sahni
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Validation of three-dimensional models of in situ scapulae.

Authors:  Chris D Bryce; Jason L Pennypacker; Nikhil Kulkarni; Emmanuel M Paul; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Timothy J Mosher; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Fast 3D reconstruction of the lower limb using a parametric model and statistical inferences and clinical measurements calculation from biplanar X-rays.

Authors:  Y Chaibi; T Cresson; B Aubert; J Hausselle; P Neyret; O Hauger; J A de Guise; W Skalli
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study.

Authors:  R S Churchill; J J Brems; H Kotschi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.

Authors:  Chris D Bryce; Andrew C Davison; Gregory S Lewis; Li Wang; Donald J Flemming; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The scapuloacromial angle: a 3D analysis of acromial slope and its relationship with shoulder impingement.

Authors:  Daniel A Moses; Eric Y Chang; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Gender differences in glenoid anatomy: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Andrea Merrill; Kara Guzman; Suzanne L Miller
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  1 in total

1.  The scapular glenopolar angle: standard values and side differences.

Authors:  Michal Tuček; Ondřej Naňka; Jozef Malík; Jan Bartoníček
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.