Literature DB >> 18280016

A stochastic analysis of glenoid inclination angle and superior migration of the humeral head.

Nicholas G Flieg1, Christopher J Gatti, Lisa Case Doro, Joseph E Langenderfer, James E Carpenter, Richard E Hughes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superior glenoid inclination, which is a relatively upward facing of the glenoid in the plane of the scapula, has been associated with rotator cuff pathology. Increased glenoid inclination may cause superior humeral head migration, which can cause impingement of the supraspinatus tendon. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that inclination angle affects the probability of superior humeral head migration.
METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the glenohumeral joint was developed in which muscle forces were modeled as random variables. Monte Carlo simulation was used to compute the probability that the glenohumeral reaction force was directed such that superior humeral head migration should occur. An electromyogram-driven model was used to estimate shoulder muscle forces in healthy volunteers performing arm elevation.
FINDINGS: The model predicted that the probability of superior humeral head migration increased as glenoid inclination angle was increased. This finding was independent of the assumed shape of the muscle force probability distributions.
INTERPRETATION: The results support the theory that glenoid inclination may be a risk factor for rotator cuff pathology.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280016      PMCID: PMC2515172          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  28 in total

1.  Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; M Elise Johanson; Joseph D Towles
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A stochastic model of elbow flexion strength for subjects with and without long head biceps tear.

Authors:  Joseph E Langenderfer; Richard E Hughes; James E Carpenter
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Katherine R S Holzbaur; Wendy M Murray; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Monte Carlo simulation of a planar shoulder model.

Authors:  R E Hughes; K N An
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Muscular synergy in the shoulder during a fatiguing static contraction.

Authors:  H Nieminen; E-P Takala; J Niemi; E Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Force analysis of individual muscles acting simultaneously on the shoulder joint during isometric abduction.

Authors:  C J De Duca; W J Forrest
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.

Authors:  G A Mirka; W S Marras
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study.

Authors:  R S Churchill; J J Brems; H Kotschi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Etiologic and pathogenetic factors for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Authors:  Samir Mehta; Jonathan A Gimbel; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.182

10.  Development and validation of a 3-D model to predict knee joint loading during dynamic movement.

Authors:  S G McLean; A Su; A J van den Bogert
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  7 in total

1.  Associations between in-vivo glenohumeral joint motion and morphology.

Authors:  Cathryn D Peltz; George Divine; Anne Drake; Nicole L Ramo; Roger Zauel; Vasilios Moutzouros; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Human evolution and tears of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Johnathan D Craik; Ravi Mallina; Vijayraj Ramasamy; Nick J Little
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Distribution of bone and tissue morphological properties related to subacromial space geometry in a young, healthy male population.

Authors:  Jaclyn N Chopp-Hurley; John M O'Neill; Clark R Dickerson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Three dimensionality of gleno-humeral deformities in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy.

Authors:  Sylvain Brochard; Joseph D Mozingo; Katharine E Alter; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Is the lateral extension of the acromion related to the outcome of shoulder injections?

Authors:  Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Beat K Moor; Gabor J Puskas; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Juerg Hodler; Cynthia K Peterson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Using a Bayesian Network to Predict L5/S1 Spinal Compression Force from Posture, Hand Load, Anthropometry, and Disc Injury Status.

Authors:  Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 1.781

7.  A computed tomography analysis of three-dimensional glenoid orientation modified by glenoid torsion.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumura; Satoshi Oki; Taku Suzuki; Takuji Iwamoto; Kazuki Sato; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-09-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.