Literature DB >> 22404237

Reliability of a set of protractors for direct anatomical measurements around the glenoid and humeral head rims.

Hippolite O Amadi1, Quentin A Fogg, Ukadike C Ugbolue, Roger J H Emery, Anthony M J Bull.   

Abstract

Functional biomechanics studies of the glenohumeral (GH) soft tissues require an understanding of their sites of bony attachment. Anatomical positions of GH capsular structures have often been quantified relative to the rims of the glenoid and humeral head (HH). The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to quantify the reliability of a set of protractors that directly fit on to the glenoid and HH rims and (2) to use this to determine direct angular position referencing of landmarks and soft tissue attachment points. Three assessors independently used the protractors to assess nine prescribed landmarks on 30 dry bone specimens (15 glenoids and 15 HHs) recording the angular positions of the structures relative to the glenoid and HH. The collected data showed high levels of validity as indicated by the protractor's intra- and inter-assessor reliabilities: 98.2 and 98.7% for the glenoid component, and 96.2 and 96.5% for the humeral component, respectively. The device could be useful in anatomical studies, description of defects and pathologies on glenohumeral articulation, and planning of scapular reconstructive surgery.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy © 2012 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22404237      PMCID: PMC3403282          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01490.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  8 in total

1.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty.

Authors:  D D Robertson; J Yuan; L U Bigliani; E L Flatow; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Variations in glenoid rim anatomy: implications regarding anchor insertion.

Authors:  Janne T Lehtinen; Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; Jonathan B Ticker; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  An anatomic study of the humeral insertion of the inferior glenohumeral capsule.

Authors:  Matthew T Sugalski; J Michael Wiater; William N Levine; Louis U Bigliani
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Tensile properties of the inferior glenohumeral ligament.

Authors:  L U Bigliani; R G Pollock; L J Soslowsky; E L Flatow; R J Pawluk; V C Mow
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Definition of the capsular insertion plane on the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Hippolite O Amadi; Sanjay M Sanghavi; Srinath Kamineni; Roman Skourat; Ulrich N Hansen; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Algorithm and validation of a computer method for quantifying attachment locus of glenohumeral ligament in vivo.

Authors:  Hippolite O Amadi; Anthony Bull
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Tensile properties of the superior glenohumeral and coracohumeral ligaments.

Authors:  N D Boardman; R E Debski; J J Warner; E Taskiran; L Maddox; A B Imhoff; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study.

Authors:  R S Churchill; J J Brems; H Kotschi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.