Literature DB >> 11508778

Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: a possible role for autonomous saccades.

R Engbert1, R Kliegl.   

Abstract

An efficient method for the exact numerical simulation of semi-Markov processes is used to study minimal models of the control of eye movements in reading. When we read a text, typical sequences of fixations form a rather complicated trajectory - almost like a random walk. Mathematical models of eye movement control can account for this behavior using stochastic transition rules between few discrete internal states, which represent combinations of certain stages of lexical access and saccade programs. We show that experimentally observed fixation durations can be explained by residence-time-dependent transition probabilities. Stochastic processes with this property are known as semi-Markov processes. For our numerical simulations we use the minimal process method (Gillespie algorithm), which is an exact and efficient simulation algorithm for this class of stochastic processes. Within this mathematical framework, we study different forms of coupling between eye movements and shifts of covert attention in reading. Our model lends support to the existence of autonomous saccades, i.e., the hypothesis that initiations of saccades are not completely determined by lexical access processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508778     DOI: 10.1007/PL00008001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  12 in total

1.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

Review 2.  Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Michael Dambacher; Olaf Dimigen; Arthur M Jacobs; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-14

3.  Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading.

Authors:  Noor Al-Zanoon; Michael Dambacher; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-07-11

4.  Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

5.  Models of the reading process.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11

6.  Human visual search behaviour is far from ideal.

Authors:  Anna Nowakowska; Alasdair D F Clarke; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Interactions dominate the dynamics of visual cognition.

Authors:  Damian G Stephen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-01-13

9.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

Review 10.  ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations.

Authors:  Hans A Trukenbrod; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.