Literature DB >> 18437484

Does the additional application of a polylactide film (SurgiWrap) to a lightweight mesh (TiMesh) reduce adhesions after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation procedures? Experimental results obtained with the laparoscopic porcine model.

Christine Schug-Pass1, Florian Sommerer, Andrea Tannapfel, Hans Lippert, Ferdinand Köckerling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal repair of incisional hernias using a mesh makes particular demands on the material used. In addition to good integration of the mesh on the parietal side, adhesions to the visceral peritoneum must be avoided. Large-pore, light-weight meshes induce fewer adhesions than heavy-weight polypropylene meshes. Although numerous adhesion-barrier substances for use in combination with a polypropylene mesh have been tested already, mostly in open small animal models, unequivocal benefits have been identified to date in only a few of the experiments.
METHODS: Using the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique, six pigs were implanted with either a lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh light) or TiMesh plus an adhesion-barrier film made of polylactide (SurgiWrap). After 3 months, the animals underwent a postmortem laparoscopy, and specimens were obtained for planimetric and histologic investigations.
RESULTS: No adhesions to intestinal structures were found in any of the animals. Adhesions between the greater omentum and the mesh did not differ significantly between the TiMesh (32%) and SurgiWrap (33.5%) groups. The shrinkage of the mesh's surface area was comparable between the two groups (18% vs. 21%). Histology showed pronounced inflammatory reaction and bridging of scar tissue between the filaments with the use of SurgiWrap versus TiMesh light without film. However, immunohistochemical investigations examining the partial volume of the inflammatory cells, the proliferation marker Ki67, and the apoptotic index at the interface of the filaments all failed to show any significant differences.
CONCLUSION: To avoid adhesions, it is essential that the acute and chronic inflammatory reaction to the implanted material be as small as possible. This requirement is met specifically by the lightweight polypropylene mesh TiMesh light. The additional application of a slowly absorbable adhesion-barrier film made of polylactide (SurgiWrap) does not appear to confer any further benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18437484     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9876-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

1.  A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of physical barriers in prevention of adhesions: an incisional hernia model in rats.

Authors:  A Alponat; S R Lakshminarasappa; M Teh; A Rajnakova; S Moochhala; P M Goh; S T Chan
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; M Müller; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

4.  Persistent extracellular matrix remodelling at the interface to polymers used for hernia repair.

Authors:  K Junge; R Rosch; L Bialasinski; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.745

5.  Abdominal wall hernia repair: a long-term comparison of Sepramesh and Dualmesh in a rabbit hernia model.

Authors:  Eric K Johnson; Christopher H Hoyt; Robert C Dinsmore
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Isaac Felemovicius; Margaret E Bonsack; Gonzalo Hagerman; John P Delaney
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area.

Authors:  J Conze; R Rosch; U Klinge; C Weiss; M Anurov; S Titkowa; A Oettinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Macrophage phagocytosis of biodegradable microspheres composed of L-lactic acid/glycolic acid homo- and copolymers.

Authors:  Y Tabata; Y Ikada
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1988-10

9.  The effect of phagocytosis of poly(L-lactic acid) fragments on cellular morphology and viability.

Authors:  K H Lam; J M Schakenraad; H Esselbrugge; J Feijen; P Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-12

10.  In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  H Scheidbach; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  9 in total

1.  Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L: -lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujino; Manabu Kinoshita; Akihiro Saitoh; Hidekazu Yano; Kahoko Nishikawa; Toshinori Fujie; Keiichi Iwaya; Minoru Kakihara; Shinji Takeoka; Daizoh Saitoh; Yuji Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Fixation of mesh to the peritoneum using a fibrin glue: investigations with a biomechanical model and an experimental laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The adhesions were thick, tenacious, and essentially growing into the serosa of adjacent small bowel loops.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily?: experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.

Authors:  Ali Rastegarpour; Michael Cheung; Madhurima Vardhan; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Charles E Butler; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

6.  Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.

Authors:  L D'Amore; F Ceci; S Mattia; M Fabbi; P Negro; F Gossetti
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Early and late postoperative inflammatory and collagen deposition responses in three different meshes: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  C G Pereira-lucena; R Artigiani Neto; D T de Rezende; G de J Lopes-Filho; D Matos; M M Linhares
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature.

Authors:  F Köckerling; C Schug-Pass
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Evaluation of synthetic reticular hybrid meshes designed for intraperitoneal abdominal wall repair: Preclinical and in vitro behavior.

Authors:  Verónica Gómez-Gil; Marta Rodríguez; Francisca García-Moreno Nisa; Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Gemma Pascual
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.