Literature DB >> 22669286

Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations.

Prema Sriram1, Alexander Klistorner, Hemamalini Arvind, Stuart L Graham.   

Abstract

The aims of the article were to study the reproducibility of latency of multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) recorded using different stimulus presentations and to identify the peak with least variability. Ten normal subjects, aged between 22 and 52 years (mean age 32 ± 8.37 years), participated in the study. All subjects underwent mfVEP testing with pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulus presentations. The stimulus subtends 26° from fixation and includes 24 segments. Only the vertical channel was recorded on all subjects. Testing was repeated after 1-2 weeks. Only the right eye of all subjects was analysed. Segments with low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR < 1.5) were excluded from analysis. The latencies were analysed to confirm values from the same peak for the two tests. The latency values were then analysed for the start of the response, the first peak and the second peak. The waveforms were reproducible throughout the field. Reproducibility of latency at the "start of the response" was significantly lesser than the first and the second peaks studied, while the reproducibility of latency at the first peak was not statistically different from the second peak for either pattern reversal or pattern pulse stimulation. The latency values were not different between the first and the second sessions for either pattern reversal or pattern pulse stimulation for any of the peaks. The pattern reversal stimulus presentation produced less variability in latency. The first peak is the most reproducible among the three measures in both the stimulus presentation.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669286     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-012-9334-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  24 in total

Review 1.  Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits.

Authors:  S L Graham; A I Klistorner; J R Grigg; F A Billson
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Christopher Rodarte; E Bo Yang; Nitin Ohri; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Improvement in conduction velocity after optic neuritis measured with the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  E Bo Yang; Donald C Hood; Chris Rodarte; Xian Zhang; Jeffrey G Odel; Myles M Behrens
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G C Ebers
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-07

8.  Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study.

Authors:  D C Hood; J G Odel; X Zhang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability.

Authors:  A I Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Neurophysiological evidence for long-term repair of MS lesions: implications for axon protection.

Authors:  Steve J Jones; Adriana Brusa
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improved measurement of intersession latency in mfVEPs.

Authors:  L De Santiago; A Fernández; R Blanco; C Pérez-Rico; J M Rodríguez-Ascariz; R Barea; J M Miguel-Jiménez; C Amo; E M Sánchez-Morla; L Boquete
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation.

Authors:  G S Souza; H B Schakelford; A L A Moura; B D Gomes; D F Ventura; M E C Fitzgerald; L C L Silveira
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.590

4.  Empirical mode decomposition processing to improve multifocal-visual-evoked-potential signal analysis in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Luis de Santiago; Eva Sánchez-Morla; Román Blanco; Juan Manuel Miguel; Carlos Amo; Miguel Ortiz Del Castillo; Almudena López; Luciano Boquete
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.