Literature DB >> 11473320

Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch.

G Robles-De-La-Torre1, V Hayward.   

Abstract

Haptic (touch) perception normally entails an active exploration of object surfaces over time. This is called active touch. When exploring the shape of an object, we experience both geometrical and force cues. For example, when sliding a finger across a surface with a rigid bump on it, the finger moves over the bump while being opposed by a force whose direction and magnitude are related to the slope of the bump. The steeper the bump, the stronger the resistance. Geometrical and force cues are correlated, but it has been commonly assumed that shape perception relies on object geometry alone. Here we show that regardless of surface geometry, subjects identified and located shape features on the basis of force cues or their correlates. Using paradoxical stimuli, for example combining the force cues of a bump with the geometry of a hole, we found that subjects perceived a bump. Conversely, when combining the force cues of a hole with the geometry of a bump, subjects typically perceived a hole.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11473320     DOI: 10.1038/35086588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  34 in total

1.  Trajectory of contact region on the fingerpad gives the illusion of haptic shape.

Authors:  Hanifa Dostmohamed; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of force cues in the haptic estimations of a virtual length.

Authors:  Pierre Wydoodt; Edouard Gentaz; Arlette Streri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Factors influencing the radial-tangential illusion in haptic perception.

Authors:  James McFarland; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mental concatenation of perceptually and cognitively specified depth to represent locations in near space.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; Damion Shelton; George Stetten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multiple Factors Underlying Haptic Perception of Length and Orientation.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Haptic two-dimensional angle categorization and discrimination.

Authors:  Iuliana Toderita; Stéphanie Bourgeon; Julien I A Voisin; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Prediction of object contact during grasping.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Direct coupling of haptic signals between hands.

Authors:  Lucile Dupin; Vincent Hayward; Mark Wexler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Coincidence avoidance principle in surface haptic interpretation.

Authors:  Steven G Manuel; Roberta L Klatzky; Michael A Peshkin; James Edward Colgate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  What you feel is what you see: inverse dynamics estimation underlies the resistive sensation of a delayed cursor.

Authors:  Shinya Takamuku; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.