Literature DB >> 26156766

What you feel is what you see: inverse dynamics estimation underlies the resistive sensation of a delayed cursor.

Shinya Takamuku1, Hiroaki Gomi2.   

Abstract

How our central nervous system (CNS) learns and exploits relationships between force and motion is a fundamental issue in computational neuroscience. While several lines of evidence have suggested that the CNS predicts motion states and signals from motor commands for control and perception (forward dynamics), it remains controversial whether it also performs the 'inverse' computation, i.e. the estimation of force from motion (inverse dynamics). Here, we show that the resistive sensation we experience while moving a delayed cursor, perceived purely from the change in visual motion, provides evidence of the inverse computation. To clearly specify the computational process underlying the sensation, we systematically varied the visual feedback and examined its effect on the strength of the sensation. In contrast to the prevailing theory that sensory prediction errors modulate our perception, the sensation did not correlate with errors in cursor motion due to the delay. Instead, it correlated with the amount of exposure to the forward acceleration of the cursor. This indicates that the delayed cursor is interpreted as a mechanical load, and the sensation represents its visually implied reaction force. Namely, the CNS automatically computes inverse dynamics, using visually detected motions, to monitor the dynamic forces involved in our actions.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Newton's laws of motion; force perception; internal model; inverse dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156766      PMCID: PMC4528553          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  38 in total

1.  Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  D J Murray; R R Ellis; C A Bandomir; H E Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence.

Authors:  S Runeson; P Juslin; H Olsson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The motor system estimates uncertainty and higher order statistics for the control of grip forces.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

6.  The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations.

Authors:  Chlöé Farrer; Scott H Frey; John D Van Horn; Eugene Tunik; David Turk; Souheil Inati; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues.

Authors:  H Z Tan; N I Durlach; G L Beauregard; M A Srinivasan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

8.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Feedback: real-time delayed vision of one's own tracking behavior.

Authors:  W M Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  12 in total

1.  Representing delayed force feedback as a combination of current and delayed states.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Firas Mawase; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Opher Donchin; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Seeing motion of controlled object improves grip timing in adults with autism spectrum condition: evidence for use of inverse dynamics in motor control.

Authors:  Shinya Takamuku; Haruhisa Ohta; Chieko Kanai; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26

4.  The Relationship Between Illusory Heaviness Sensation and the Motion Speed of Visual Feedback in Gesture-Based Touchless Inputs.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Yusuke Ujitoko; Takumi Yokosaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays.

Authors:  Raz Leib; Amir Karniel; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Energy exchanges at contact events guide sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Ali Farshchian; Alessandra Sciutti; Assaf Pressman; Ilana Nisky; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Tandem internal models execute motor learning in the cerebellum.

Authors:  Takeru Honda; Soichi Nagao; Yuji Hashimoto; Kinya Ishikawa; Takanori Yokota; Hidehiro Mizusawa; Masao Ito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neglect-Like Effects on Drawing Symmetry Induced by Adaptation to a Laterally Asymmetric Visuomotor Delay.

Authors:  Chen Avraham; Guy Avraham; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Better grip force control by attending to the controlled object: Evidence for direct force estimation from visual motion.

Authors:  Shinya Takamuku; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Visual Feedback of Object Motion Direction Influences the Timing of Grip Force Modulation During Object Manipulation.

Authors:  Simone Toma; Veronica Caputo; Marco Santello
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.