Literature DB >> 25675477

Coincidence avoidance principle in surface haptic interpretation.

Steven G Manuel1, Roberta L Klatzky2, Michael A Peshkin1, James Edward Colgate3.   

Abstract

When multiple fingertips experience force sensations, how does the brain interpret the combined sensation? In particular, under what conditions are the sensations perceived as separate or, alternatively, as an integrated whole? In this work, we used a custom force-feedback device to display force signals to two fingertips (index finger and thumb) as they traveled along collinear paths. Each finger experienced a pattern of forces that, taken individually, produced illusory virtual bumps, and subjects reported whether they felt zero, one, or two bumps. We varied the spatial separation between these bump-like force-feedback regions, from being much greater than the finger span to nearly exactly the finger span. When the bump spacing was the same as the finger span, subjects tended to report only one bump. We found that the results are consistent with a quantitative model of perception in which the brain selects a structural interpretation of force signals that relies on minimizing coincidence stemming from accidental alignments between fingertips and inferred surface structures.

Keywords:  bumps; kinesthetic; perception; surface haptic; touch

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25675477      PMCID: PMC4345605          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412750112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination.

Authors:  M G Bloj; D Kersten; A C Hurlbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect.

Authors:  D A Slutsky; G H Recanzone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch.

Authors:  G Robles-De-La-Torre; V Hayward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Bayesian models of object perception.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces.

Authors:  K Nakayama; S Shimojo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Gemma A Calvert; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception.

Authors:  W T Freeman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cross-correlation between auditory and visual signals promotes multisensory integration.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Vanessa Harrar; Marc O Ernst; Charles Spence
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.286

10.  Object classification for human and ideal observers.

Authors:  Z Liu; D C Knill; D Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.