Literature DB >> 18592227

Prediction of object contact during grasping.

Daniel Säfström1, Benoni B Edin.   

Abstract

The maximum grip aperture (MGA) during prehension is linearly related to the size of objects to be grasped and is adapted to the haptically sensed object size when there is a discrepancy between visual and haptic information. We have investigated what information is used to drive this adaptation process and how the onset of fingertip forces on the object is triggered. Subjects performed a reach-to-grasp task, where the object seen and the object grasped physically never were the same. We measured the movements of the index finger and the thumb and the contact forces between each fingertip and the object. The subjects' adaptation of the MGA was unrelated both to different fingertip velocities at the moment of object contact, or the fingertip forces. Instead, the 'timing' of contact between the fingers and the object was most consistently influenced by introducing a size discrepancy. Specifically, if the object was larger than expected, the moment of contact occurred earlier, and if the object was decreased in size, then the contact occurred later. During adaptation, these timing differences were markedly reduced. Also, the motor command for applying forces on the object seemed to be released in anticipation of the predicted moment of contact. We therefore conclude that the CNS dynamically predicts when contact between the fingertips and objects occur and that aperture adaptation is primarily driven by timing prediction errors.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18592227     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1469-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension.

Authors:  A Churchill; B Hopkins; L Rönnqvist; S Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The relation between force and movement when grasping an object with a precision grip.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Short-term plasticity of the visuomotor map during grasping movements in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Representation of object size in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  L J Berryman; J M Yau; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Adaptation of grasping responses to distorted object size and orientation.

Authors:  Cornelia Weigelt; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Martin Lemay; Linda M Squire; Yury P Shimansky; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neural Coding of Contact Events in Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Thierri Callier; Aneesha K Suresh; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Nonvisual learning of intrinsic object properties in a reaching task dissociates grasp from reach.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Leandra R Schneider; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Sensorimotor control of contact force.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Biomimetic encoding model for restoring touch in bionic hands through a nerve interface.

Authors:  Elizaveta V Okorokova; Qinpu He; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Tzvi Ganel; Caitlin M Byrne; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Anticipatory action planning in blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Andrea Cavallo; Caterina Ansuini; Monica Gori; Carla Tinti; Alessia Tonelli; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  How does ageing affect grasp adaptation to a visual-haptic size conflict?

Authors:  Samuel Couth; Emma Gowen; Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.