Literature DB >> 28565449

PERSPECTIVE: THE PACE OF MODERN LIFE: MEASURING RATES OF CONTEMPORARY MICROEVOLUTION.

Andrew P Hendry1, Michael T Kinnison2.   

Abstract

We evaluate methods for measuring and specifying rates of microevolution in the wild, with particular regard to studies of contemporary, often deemed "rapid," evolution. A considerable amount of ambiguity and inconsistency persists within the field, and we provide a number of suggestions that should improve study design, inference, and clarity of presentation. (1) Some studies measure change over time within a population (allochronic) and others measure the difference between two populations that had a common ancestor in the past (synchronic). Allochronic studies can be used to estimate rates of "evolution," whereas synchronic studies more appropriately estimate rates of "divergence." Rates of divergence may range from a small fraction to many times the actual evolutionary rates in the component populations. (2) Some studies measure change using individuals captured from the wild, whereas others measure differences after rearing in a common environment. The first type of study can be used to specify "phenotypic" rates and the later "genetic" rates. (3) The most commonly used evolutionary rate metric, the darwin, has a number of theoretical shortcomings. Studies of microevolution would benefit from specifying rates in standard deviations per generation, the haldane. (4) Evolutionary rates are typically specified without an indication of their precision. Readily available methods for specifying confidence intervals and statistical significance (regression, bootstrapping, randomization) should be implemented. (5) Microevolutionists should strive to accumulate time series, which can reveal temporal shifts in the rate of evolution and can be used to identify evolutionary patterns. (6) Evolutionary rates provide a convenient way to compare the tempo of evolution across studies, traits, taxa, and time scales, but such comparisons are subject to varying degrees of confidence. Comparisons across different time scales are particularly tenuous. (7) A number of multivariate rate measures exist, but considerable theoretical development is required before their utility can be determined. We encourage the continued investigation of evolutionary rates because the information they provide is relevant to a wide range of theoretical and practical issues. © 1999 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Darwins; evolutionary rates; haldanes; microevolution; population divergence; rapid evolution

Year:  1999        PMID: 28565449     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04550.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  90 in total

1.  Evolution of biological information.

Authors:  T D Schneider
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild.

Authors:  H E Hoekstra; J M Hoekstra; D Berrigan; S N Vignieri; A Hoang; C E Hill; P Beerli; J G Kingsolver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic change for earlier migration timing in a pink salmon population.

Authors:  Ryan P Kovach; Anthony J Gharrett; David A Tallmon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change.

Authors:  Jill T Anderson; David W Inouye; Amy M McKinney; Robert I Colautti; Tom Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Rapid evolution of osmoregulatory function by modification of gene transcription in steelhead trout.

Authors:  Tutku Aykanat; Frank P Thrower; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Evolution of stickleback in 50 years on earthquake-uplifted islands.

Authors:  Emily A Lescak; Susan L Bassham; Julian Catchen; Ofer Gelmond; Mary L Sherbick; Frank A von Hippel; William A Cresko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Urban environment and cancer in wildlife: available evidence and future research avenues.

Authors:  Tuul Sepp; Beata Ujvari; Paul W Ewald; Frédéric Thomas; Mathieu Giraudeau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Effects of rapid prey evolution on predator-prey cycles.

Authors:  Laura E Jones; Stephen P Ellner
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Genetic composition of resident populations influences establishment success of immigrant species.

Authors:  Luc De Meester; Gerald Louette; Cathy Duvivier; Celien Van Damme; Erik Michels
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Morphological stasis in an ongoing gastropod radiation from Lake Malawi.

Authors:  Bert Van Bocxlaer; Gene Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.